Oct. 19, 2016
6:57 p.m.
Indeed. In fact I think we are wasting our time if we don't do that. But I find it amusing and curious that the CCWG would include a term in a proposed by-law and only AFTER transition, seek to understand its true construction. What if the correct interpretiation completely defeats any obligation upon ICANN to respect human rights? On 19/10/16 19:51, Greg Shatan wrote:
All the more reason that we need to be clear about what "applicable law" means and how it applies in this context.