Dear all, Unfortunately I have just been called into a meeting for all the lawyers in my office. I know that Greg is also unable to attend this call. One point I would like to make is that members of the drafting team are not all from the same constituency as Kavouss has suggested. Greg and I may be from IPC, but David is from the registries and Tatiana is not from either one of these. She may be ALAC – I am not certain. Matthew Shears was involved and he is also from the non-commercial side of things. Sorry but I will have to enter back into the conversation after listening to the transcript from this meeting. IF my all lawyers meeting ends sooner, I will come back in during the call. Thanks to everyone for their active participation. Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com> _____________________________ [cid:image003.png@01D315BD.BF34D7F0] Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com<http://lrrc.com/> From: Schaefer, Brett [mailto:Brett.Schaefer@heritage.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 11:41 AM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne Cc: Niels ten Oever; ws2-hr@icann.org Subject: Re: [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda August 15 19:00 UTC Unfortunately, I cannot make the call, but I support the text as drafted by David, Greg, and Tatiana. ________________________________ Brett Schaefer Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy The Heritage Foundation 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20002 202-608-6097 heritage.org<http://heritage.org/> __________ On Aug 15, 2017, at 2:09 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com>> wrote: Hi Niels. The proposed text is pasted below in blue. "3.1 When examining its internal operations, ICANN the organization could, if it so chooses, consider using a mechanism to assess its impact on Human Rights. Whether and, if so, what mechanism to choose is solely up to ICANN the organization to decide. No such assessment should directly or indirectly impact gTLD policy formation or execution without being fully consistent with existing processes and protocols. The results of the organization's analysis should be reflected in its annual reporting" The old text (and redlined text per your suggestion at the last meeting is attached.) It appears the primary changes from the old language to the new proposed language from the drafting team are: 1. Add “if it so chooses” 2. No specific reference to any specific assessment tool – either HRIA or UNGP 3. Specific reference to any impact on gTLD policy formation to be consistent with existing ICANN processes and protocols Hope this helps. Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com> _______________________________ Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com<http://lrrc.com> -----Original Message----- From: Niels ten Oever [mailto:lists@nielstenoever.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 6:12 AM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; ws2-hr@icann.org<mailto:ws2-hr@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda August 15 19:00 UTC Hi Anne, Thanks for this, I reckon this means the drafting team hasn't come together and wasn't able to provide us with alternative text? Anne, could you provide us with the old text, new proposed text and redline version so we have very clear what do discuss? Thanks, Niels On 08/14/2017 11:47 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote:
Thanks Niels. Have not heard from anyone though I raised my hand to
volunteer. I propose adding the following language to whatever is
determined for the changed language to accommodate the public comment
from the governments:
“To the extent that the foregoing assessment may impact gTLD policy,
ICANN the organisation will review such mechanisms in accordance with
the existing processes and protocols”.
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
520.629.4428 office
520.879.4725 fax
AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com>
_______________________________
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
lrrc.com<http://lrrc.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] On
Behalf Of Niels ten Oever
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 2:00 PM
To: ws2-hr@icann.org<mailto:ws2-hr@icann.org>
Subject: [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda August 15 19:00 UTC
Dear all,
I hope this email finds you all well. I am looking forward to discuss
with you tomorrow the statement prepared by the draftig team.
Unfortunately I haven't received the statement from them yet, but I am
sure they are working hard on it.
Please find all proposed items for the agenda below and attached:
1. Administrivia
Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc
2. Review proposed change by drafting team 3. Discussion approach to
statement to CCWG 4. AOB
As always I'm greatly looking forward to the call, you questions and
suggestions.
All the best,
Niels
--
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital
Article 19
www.article19.org<http://www.article19.org> <http://www.article19.org>
PGP fingerprint 2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488
643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of
this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment
to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any
attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to
the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act,
18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org<http://www.article19.org> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. <Redline HR from 8 Aug 2017 Call.png> _______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org<mailto:Ws2-hr@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
