Hello, Thanks for the information. I personally think it would have been better to address item 2 before executing item 1. I really wonder what's the rush to put the FoI to public comment. All the Best. Regards Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos On 12 Jan 2017 12:22, "Niels ten Oever" <lists@nielstenoever.net> wrote:
Dear all,
A short update from yesterday's plenary:
1. The FoI had its second reading and ICANN staff is now preparing it for a public comment period. Congratulations to all on this success.
2. The CCWG co-chairs have taken our question to the plenary into consideration and will come with an advice as soon as possible.
I hope we will receive the CCWG co-chairs' advice before our meeting on Tuesday so we can discuss it there.
All the best,
Niels _______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr