Niels Thank you, this is very useful indeed. Since you mentioned Ruggie, I wonder what his response might be to expressed concerns. With regard to due diligence, I'm not clear if icann already has a process that triggers a due diligence process with regards to human rights per se. rd On Oct 3, 2016 11:07 AM, "Niels ten Oever" <lists@nielstenoever.net> wrote:
Dear all,
I hope this e-mail finds you well. To ensure nothing of our constructive discussions is getting lost, and to help us continue to be very concrete, I would like to share with you the attached document, that can also be found here (page 2 onwards):
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1emqmzyB9_ 0vm6oKxhIWZ47L7lxcFKUBHVnkBYUOsA2Q/edit
The document aims to represent a sedimentation of our discussion and suggest a way forward, by providing potential text for the Framework of Interpretation. Partially inspired by the reaction of John Ruggie when I brought up our concerns with him.
I hope this proves to be useful, and I am more than happy to discuss it with you all on the list and the call, and of course work on suggestions and comments in the Google Doc.
Best,
Niels
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr