Proposed Agenda FIRST READING considerations document March 21 19:00 UTC
Dear all, Please find attached and underneath the agenda for our session tomorrow March 21 at 19:00 UTC. The document we'll discuss is the Copenhagen Drafting Team Consensus Document, which clearly was not a full consensus, so I've added the minority position of Anne Aikman-Scalese to the document for discussion. Even though these two points are unresolved I hope we can still aim to have a first reading of the document, next to the discussion of the points of course. 1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. First reading (of two) of the Considerations document prepared by the drafting team 3. AOB The document can also be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rDYyuXacrSYDtlSK5JqNQe7XOX2LbM86AzfDay8z... Please let me know if you have any questions or suggestions. All the best, Niels -- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
Thank you Niels. Regarding the agenda, I believe we also stated in the drafting team meeting on Saturday that we were going to discuss with the full subgroup the call we had with the U.N. representative (Anita) arranged by Mark Carvell and the point that some in the group wanted to submit the documents to the U.N. representative prior to finalizing the recommendation to the full CCWG. Even if the document is not submitted, we should advise the full subgroup of the call so I hope this can be added to the agenda. Thank you, Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com _______________________________ Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com -----Original Message----- From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 2:44 PM To: ws2-hr@icann.org Subject: [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda FIRST READING considerations document March 21 19:00 UTC Dear all, Please find attached and underneath the agenda for our session tomorrow March 21 at 19:00 UTC. The document we'll discuss is the Copenhagen Drafting Team Consensus Document, which clearly was not a full consensus, so I've added the minority position of Anne Aikman-Scalese to the document for discussion. Even though these two points are unresolved I hope we can still aim to have a first reading of the document, next to the discussion of the points of course. 1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. First reading (of two) of the Considerations document prepared by the drafting team 3. AOB The document can also be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rDYyuXacrSYDtlSK5JqNQe7XOX2LbM86AzfDay8z... Please let me know if you have any questions or suggestions. All the best, Niels -- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
It seems appropriate to discuss the call we had (since it happened). I don't believe she was a "UN representative" per se, but she (Anita Ramasastry (?)) had some relationship to the UN. (Unfortunately, I don't believe it was recorded, and I assume that none of us who were there have perfect recall, given mental overload, sleep deprivation, etc., but that's life.) I would be opposed to any plan to submit any of our documents to Prof. Ramasastry before finalizing and submitting them to the CCWG. She can always comment in the Public Comment period. But we shouldn't privilege any non-participant in this manner. This is particularly the case since the current draft essentially makes no recommendation regarding the application (or not) of Ruggie in any operationalization* of the Bylaw. Thus it seems unnecessary, as well as inappropriate. Greg *(I use "operationalization" to avoid confusion with "implementation", which typically is used in ICANN-land to refer to post-policy development implementation of a policy. What we are referring to here is "implementing"/operationalization a Bylaw through policy development or through the modification of a policy development process.) On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com> wrote:
Thank you Niels. Regarding the agenda, I believe we also stated in the drafting team meeting on Saturday that we were going to discuss with the full subgroup the call we had with the U.N. representative (Anita) arranged by Mark Carvell and the point that some in the group wanted to submit the documents to the U.N. representative prior to finalizing the recommendation to the full CCWG.
Even if the document is not submitted, we should advise the full subgroup of the call so I hope this can be added to the agenda. Thank you,
Anne
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com _______________________________
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com -----Original Message----- From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 2:44 PM To: ws2-hr@icann.org Subject: [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda FIRST READING considerations document March 21 19:00 UTC
Dear all,
Please find attached and underneath the agenda for our session tomorrow March 21 at 19:00 UTC.
The document we'll discuss is the Copenhagen Drafting Team Consensus Document, which clearly was not a full consensus, so I've added the minority position of Anne Aikman-Scalese to the document for discussion.
Even though these two points are unresolved I hope we can still aim to have a first reading of the document, next to the discussion of the points of course.
1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. First reading (of two) of the Considerations document prepared by the drafting team 3. AOB
The document can also be found here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rDYyuXacrSYDtlSK5JqNQe7XOX2LbM86AzfDay8z...
Please let me know if you have any questions or suggestions.
All the best,
Niels
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
________________________________
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. _______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
-- *Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428 S: gsshatan Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428 gregshatanipc@gmail.com
My full support to what Greg just said. I couldn't attend the call due to other obligations, but I am puzzled with the suggestion to send a document to a non-participant - who never contributed to the work of the group - before sending it to the plenary. What exactly is going to be achieved by this? Ms. Ramasastry can join the group now (as far as I understand we are open to participation at any stage), or she can choose to submit her comments in the public comment period. Anything else is the obstruction of the process. Cheers Tanya On 20/03/17 23:36, Greg Shatan wrote:
It seems appropriate to discuss the call we had (since it happened). I don't believe she was a "UN representative" per se, but she (Anita Ramasastry (?)) had some relationship to the UN. (Unfortunately, I don't believe it was recorded, and I assume that none of us who were there have perfect recall, given mental overload, sleep deprivation, etc., but that's life.)
I would be opposed to any plan to submit any of our documents to Prof. Ramasastry before finalizing and submitting them to the CCWG. She can always comment in the Public Comment period. But we shouldn't privilege any non-participant in this manner. This is particularly the case since the current draft essentially makes no recommendation regarding the application (or not) of Ruggie in any operationalization* of the Bylaw. Thus it seems unnecessary, as well as inappropriate.
Greg
*(I use "operationalization" to avoid confusion with "implementation", which typically is used in ICANN-land to refer to post-policy development implementation of a policy. What we are referring to here is "implementing"/operationalization a Bylaw through policy development or through the modification of a policy development process.)
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com <mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com>> wrote:
Thank you Niels. Regarding the agenda, I believe we also stated in the drafting team meeting on Saturday that we were going to discuss with the full subgroup the call we had with the U.N. representative (Anita) arranged by Mark Carvell and the point that some in the group wanted to submit the documents to the U.N. representative prior to finalizing the recommendation to the full CCWG.
Even if the document is not submitted, we should advise the full subgroup of the call so I hope this can be added to the agenda. Thank you,
Anne
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com <mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com> _______________________________
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com <http://lrrc.com> -----Original Message----- From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org <mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org <mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 2:44 PM To: ws2-hr@icann.org <mailto:ws2-hr@icann.org> Subject: [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda FIRST READING considerations document March 21 19:00 UTC
Dear all,
Please find attached and underneath the agenda for our session tomorrow March 21 at 19:00 UTC.
The document we'll discuss is the Copenhagen Drafting Team Consensus Document, which clearly was not a full consensus, so I've added the minority position of Anne Aikman-Scalese to the document for discussion.
Even though these two points are unresolved I hope we can still aim to have a first reading of the document, next to the discussion of the points of course.
1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. First reading (of two) of the Considerations document prepared by the drafting team 3. AOB
The document can also be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rDYyuXacrSYDtlSK5JqNQe7XOX2LbM86AzfDay8z...
Please let me know if you have any questions or suggestions.
All the best,
Niels
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org <http://www.article19.org>
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
________________________________
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. _______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org <mailto:Ws2-hr@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
--
*Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428 S: gsshatan Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428 gregshatanipc@gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
+ 1 On 20/03/2017 22:49, Dr. Tatiana Tropina wrote:
My full support to what Greg just said. I couldn't attend the call due to other obligations, but I am puzzled with the suggestion to send a document to a non-participant - who never contributed to the work of the group - before sending it to the plenary. What exactly is going to be achieved by this? Ms. Ramasastry can join the group now (as far as I understand we are open to participation at any stage), or she can choose to submit her comments in the public comment period. Anything else is the obstruction of the process.
Cheers
Tanya
On 20/03/17 23:36, Greg Shatan wrote:
It seems appropriate to discuss the call we had (since it happened). I don't believe she was a "UN representative" per se, but she (Anita Ramasastry (?)) had some relationship to the UN. (Unfortunately, I don't believe it was recorded, and I assume that none of us who were there have perfect recall, given mental overload, sleep deprivation, etc., but that's life.)
I would be opposed to any plan to submit any of our documents to Prof. Ramasastry before finalizing and submitting them to the CCWG. She can always comment in the Public Comment period. But we shouldn't privilege any non-participant in this manner. This is particularly the case since the current draft essentially makes no recommendation regarding the application (or not) of Ruggie in any operationalization* of the Bylaw. Thus it seems unnecessary, as well as inappropriate.
Greg
*(I use "operationalization" to avoid confusion with "implementation", which typically is used in ICANN-land to refer to post-policy development implementation of a policy. What we are referring to here is "implementing"/operationalization a Bylaw through policy development or through the modification of a policy development process.)
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com <mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com>> wrote:
Thank you Niels. Regarding the agenda, I believe we also stated in the drafting team meeting on Saturday that we were going to discuss with the full subgroup the call we had with the U.N. representative (Anita) arranged by Mark Carvell and the point that some in the group wanted to submit the documents to the U.N. representative prior to finalizing the recommendation to the full CCWG.
Even if the document is not submitted, we should advise the full subgroup of the call so I hope this can be added to the agenda. Thank you,
Anne
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com <mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com> _______________________________
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com <http://lrrc.com> -----Original Message----- From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org <mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org <mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 2:44 PM To: ws2-hr@icann.org <mailto:ws2-hr@icann.org> Subject: [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda FIRST READING considerations document March 21 19:00 UTC
Dear all,
Please find attached and underneath the agenda for our session tomorrow March 21 at 19:00 UTC.
The document we'll discuss is the Copenhagen Drafting Team Consensus Document, which clearly was not a full consensus, so I've added the minority position of Anne Aikman-Scalese to the document for discussion.
Even though these two points are unresolved I hope we can still aim to have a first reading of the document, next to the discussion of the points of course.
1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. First reading (of two) of the Considerations document prepared by the drafting team 3. AOB
The document can also be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rDYyuXacrSYDtlSK5JqNQe7XOX2LbM86AzfDay8z...
Please let me know if you have any questions or suggestions.
All the best,
Niels
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org <http://www.article19.org>
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
________________________________
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. _______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org <mailto:Ws2-hr@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
--
*Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428 S: gsshatan Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428 gregshatanipc@gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_camp...> Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_camp...>
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
-- ------------ Matthew Shears Global Internet Policy and Human Rights Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT) + 44 771 2472987
Dear all, Thanks for the discussion. My proposal under the Administrivia heading would indeed have been to informally invite Ms Ramastry and the UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights to respond during the public comment period. All the best, Niels On 03/20/2017 11:51 PM, matthew shears wrote:
+ 1
On 20/03/2017 22:49, Dr. Tatiana Tropina wrote:
My full support to what Greg just said. I couldn't attend the call due to other obligations, but I am puzzled with the suggestion to send a document to a non-participant - who never contributed to the work of the group - before sending it to the plenary. What exactly is going to be achieved by this? Ms. Ramasastry can join the group now (as far as I understand we are open to participation at any stage), or she can choose to submit her comments in the public comment period. Anything else is the obstruction of the process.
Cheers
Tanya
On 20/03/17 23:36, Greg Shatan wrote:
It seems appropriate to discuss the call we had (since it happened). I don't believe she was a "UN representative" per se, but she (Anita Ramasastry (?)) had some relationship to the UN. (Unfortunately, I don't believe it was recorded, and I assume that none of us who were there have perfect recall, given mental overload, sleep deprivation, etc., but that's life.)
I would be opposed to any plan to submit any of our documents to Prof. Ramasastry before finalizing and submitting them to the CCWG. She can always comment in the Public Comment period. But we shouldn't privilege any non-participant in this manner. This is particularly the case since the current draft essentially makes no recommendation regarding the application (or not) of Ruggie in any operationalization* of the Bylaw. Thus it seems unnecessary, as well as inappropriate.
Greg
*(I use "operationalization" to avoid confusion with "implementation", which typically is used in ICANN-land to refer to post-policy development implementation of a policy. What we are referring to here is "implementing"/operationalization a Bylaw through policy development or through the modification of a policy development process.)
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com <mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com>> wrote:
Thank you Niels. Regarding the agenda, I believe we also stated in the drafting team meeting on Saturday that we were going to discuss with the full subgroup the call we had with the U.N. representative (Anita) arranged by Mark Carvell and the point that some in the group wanted to submit the documents to the U.N. representative prior to finalizing the recommendation to the full CCWG.
Even if the document is not submitted, we should advise the full subgroup of the call so I hope this can be added to the agenda. Thank you,
Anne
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com <mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com> _______________________________
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com <http://lrrc.com> -----Original Message----- From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org <mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org <mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 2:44 PM To: ws2-hr@icann.org <mailto:ws2-hr@icann.org> Subject: [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda FIRST READING considerations document March 21 19:00 UTC
Dear all,
Please find attached and underneath the agenda for our session tomorrow March 21 at 19:00 UTC.
The document we'll discuss is the Copenhagen Drafting Team Consensus Document, which clearly was not a full consensus, so I've added the minority position of Anne Aikman-Scalese to the document for discussion.
Even though these two points are unresolved I hope we can still aim to have a first reading of the document, next to the discussion of the points of course.
1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. First reading (of two) of the Considerations document prepared by the drafting team 3. AOB
The document can also be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rDYyuXacrSYDtlSK5JqNQe7XOX2LbM86AzfDay8z...
Please let me know if you have any questions or suggestions.
All the best,
Niels
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org <http://www.article19.org>
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
________________________________
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. _______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org <mailto:Ws2-hr@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
--
*Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428 S: gsshatan Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428 gregshatanipc@gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_camp...> Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_camp...>
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
-- ------------ Matthew Shears Global Internet Policy and Human Rights Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT) + 44 771 2472987
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
Thanks Niels. I do think this needs to be added to the agenda (a short 5 minute item) so that you can brief the subgroup on the call. Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com _______________________________ Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com -----Original Message----- From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 1:15 AM To: ws2-hr@icann.org Subject: Re: [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda FIRST READING considerations document March 21 19:00 UTC Dear all, Thanks for the discussion. My proposal under the Administrivia heading would indeed have been to informally invite Ms Ramastry and the UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights to respond during the public comment period. All the best, Niels On 03/20/2017 11:51 PM, matthew shears wrote:
+ 1
On 20/03/2017 22:49, Dr. Tatiana Tropina wrote:
My full support to what Greg just said. I couldn't attend the call due to other obligations, but I am puzzled with the suggestion to send a document to a non-participant - who never contributed to the work of the group - before sending it to the plenary. What exactly is going to be achieved by this? Ms. Ramasastry can join the group now (as far as I understand we are open to participation at any stage), or she can choose to submit her comments in the public comment period. Anything else is the obstruction of the process.
Cheers
Tanya
On 20/03/17 23:36, Greg Shatan wrote:
It seems appropriate to discuss the call we had (since it happened). I don't believe she was a "UN representative" per se, but she (Anita Ramasastry (?)) had some relationship to the UN. (Unfortunately, I don't believe it was recorded, and I assume that none of us who were there have perfect recall, given mental overload, sleep deprivation, etc., but that's life.)
I would be opposed to any plan to submit any of our documents to Prof. Ramasastry before finalizing and submitting them to the CCWG. She can always comment in the Public Comment period. But we shouldn't privilege any non-participant in this manner. This is particularly the case since the current draft essentially makes no recommendation regarding the application (or not) of Ruggie in any operationalization* of the Bylaw. Thus it seems unnecessary, as well as inappropriate.
Greg
*(I use "operationalization" to avoid confusion with "implementation", which typically is used in ICANN-land to refer to post-policy development implementation of a policy. What we are referring to here is "implementing"/operationalization a Bylaw through policy development or through the modification of a policy development process.)
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com <mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com>> wrote:
Thank you Niels. Regarding the agenda, I believe we also stated in the drafting team meeting on Saturday that we were going to discuss with the full subgroup the call we had with the U.N. representative (Anita) arranged by Mark Carvell and the point that some in the group wanted to submit the documents to the U.N. representative prior to finalizing the recommendation to the full CCWG.
Even if the document is not submitted, we should advise the full subgroup of the call so I hope this can be added to the agenda. Thank you,
Anne
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com <mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com> _______________________________
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com <http://lrrc.com> -----Original Message----- From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org <mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org <mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 2:44 PM To: ws2-hr@icann.org <mailto:ws2-hr@icann.org> Subject: [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda FIRST READING considerations document March 21 19:00 UTC
Dear all,
Please find attached and underneath the agenda for our session tomorrow March 21 at 19:00 UTC.
The document we'll discuss is the Copenhagen Drafting Team Consensus Document, which clearly was not a full consensus, so I've added the minority position of Anne Aikman-Scalese to the document for discussion.
Even though these two points are unresolved I hope we can still aim to have a first reading of the document, next to the discussion of the points of course.
1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. First reading (of two) of the Considerations document prepared by the drafting team 3. AOB
The document can also be found here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rDYyuXacrSYDtlSK5JqNQe7XOX2LbM86 AzfDay8zpoE/edit
Please let me know if you have any questions or suggestions.
All the best,
Niels
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org <http://www.article19.org>
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
________________________________
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. _______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org <mailto:Ws2-hr@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
--
*Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428 S: gsshatan Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428 gregshatanipc@gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_camp...> Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link& utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
-- ------------ Matthew Shears Global Internet Policy and Human Rights Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT) + 44 771 2472987
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 _______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
participants (5)
-
Aikman-Scalese, Anne -
Dr. Tatiana Tropina -
Greg Shatan -
matthew shears -
Niels ten Oever