- Ws2-jurisdiction - lists.icann.org

CCWG-Accountability-WS2-Jurisdiction Meeting Wednesday 21 February 1300 UTC - Reminder to confirm
by Bernard Turcotte Feb. 16, 2018

Feb. 16, 2018

All, corrected the SUBJECT line which was missing that this was for the Jurisdiction call. Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability-WS2 On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Bernard Turcotte < turcotte.bernard(a)gmail.com> wrote: > All, > > This is a reminder to please confirm your participation in the above > mentioned meeting. > > We require a minimum of 5 confirmations 36 hours prior to the call to > confirm holding it. > > In this case the deadline for confirming is Tuesday 20 February 0100UTC. > > Thank You. > > > Bernard Turcotte > ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability-WS2 > > >

1 0

CCWG-Accountability-WS2 Meeting Wednesday 21 February 1300 UTC - Reminder to confirm
by Bernard Turcotte Feb. 16, 2018

Feb. 16, 2018

All, This is a reminder to please confirm your participation in the above mentioned meeting. We require a minimum of 5 confirmations 36 hours prior to the call to confirm holding it. In this case the deadline for confirming is Tuesday 20 February 0100UTC. Thank You. Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability-WS2

1 0

Recordings, DAIRs, Raw Caption Notes for Jurisdiction Subgroup Meeting #55 | 14 February 2018
by MSSI Secretariat Feb. 16, 2018

Feb. 16, 2018

Hello all, Please find the recordings, Decisions, Action Items, Requests (DAIRs), and raw caption notes for CCWG Accountability WS2 Jurisdiction Subgroup Meeting #55 – 14 February 2018 posted at https://community.icann.org/x/ewa8B The transcript will be posted on when it becomes available (usually in 3 to 5 business days after the call). A copy of the DAIRs and raw caption notes may be found below. Thank you. With kind regards, Brenda Brewer, Projects & Operations Assistant Multistakeholder Strategy & Strategic Initiatives (MSSI) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) [cid:image001.png@01D3A686.5D14A960] Action Items: * GS to produce two footnote options regarding the REASONABLE BEST EFFORT discussion for the list. Raw Captioning Notes Disclaimer: This rough edit transcript, which may contain missing, misspelled or paraphrased words, is only provided for your immediate review and is not certified as verbatim and is not to be cited in any way. * Word Doc<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79431291/CCWG-Accountabili…> * PDF<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79431291/CCWG-Accountabili…> Decisions: * Continue second reading of comments starting at comment 9.01 on next call Requests: * (none) Next Meeting: * Wednesday 21 February 1300 UTC Documents Presented * WS2-Jurisdiction-Final Draft v1.2.3<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79431291/WS2-Jurisdiction-…>

1 0

FOR YOUR REVIEW: Revisions-in-Process version of Jurisdiction Subgroup Report
by Greg Shatan Feb. 12, 2018

Feb. 12, 2018

All, I have attached Word and PDF versions of the revisions-in-process version of the Jurisdiction Subgroup Report. This draft is also available as a Google Doc at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rdMJyvZdyN9TApT6gx_3NwpdvIL7YKHEUD7tNfL… This draft reflects changes to the consensus of the Subgroup’s Draft Report based on the Subgroup’s review and discussion of the Public Comments. I would like to draw your attention particularly to the following items: 1. *Consensus Check Needed on Recommending a Method of Choosing Governing Law. *On the February 7 Subgroup call, there was considerable support for changing the consensus on how the “choice of law” would be chosen from the menu. In the Comment Draft, the Subgroup mentioned both having the registry (or the registrar) choose the governing law and having the choice of governing law be subject to negotiation, without expressing a preference for either. On the Subgroup call, there was support for recommending that the registry (or the registrar) choose the governing law, and stating expressly that it would not be negotiated with ICANN. *It is important to see if we have a new consensus among the Subgroup members, not just those on the call, since the call was lightly attended. A*ny “recommendation” by this Subgroup on this issue will be advisory only and not truly a recommendation (i.e., one that if approved by the Chartering Orgs and the Board, must be put in place), since amendments to the base agreements are governed by a separate process. *If we adopt this new approach, the marked proposed changes on pages 5, 20, 21 and 25 would be accepted. If not, these changes would not be adopted. (For your convenience, there is a comment attached to each of these proposed changes.)* 2. *Proposed Language Needed from NCSG on change to OFAC General License Recommendation. *On the February 7 Subgroup call, there was discussion of the NCSG’s comment on the recommendation relating to OFAC general licenses, which suggested changing the consensus language on this point to a firmer approach. Since we were coming to the end of the call, and the NCSG comment did not suggest exact edits to the current language, a request was made to the NCSG representatives on the call that a proposed revision be circulated so that the Subgroup could have a more concrete discussion of the proposed change. It would be very helpful to have this new language ASAP. If none is forthcoming, I will try my best to come up with a proposed revision this recommendation before the call. 3. *Summary of Subgroup’s Latest Work added to “Background” Section (page 11). *The summary of work in the public comment draft necessary ended before the draft was completed by the Subgroup for submission to the Plenary. I have now added proposed language describing events since that time, particularly the submission of the dissenting opinion by the Government of Brazil, the approval of the Report by the Plenary, the Public Comment period, the receipt of Comments, and the Subgroup’s consideration of the Comments. While there are other proposed changes in the document, I believe these are the most significant. We will go over these points in our upcoming call and, hopefully, complete our “second reading” of the Comments as well, including any changes to the Subgroup’s consensus requiring revisions to the Report. I look forward to our call. Best regards, Greg

1 0

Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] CCWG-Accountability-WS2-Jurisdiction Meeting Wednesday 14 February 1900 UTC - Reminder to confirm
by Bernard Turcotte Feb. 12, 2018

Feb. 12, 2018

All, We now have our minimum required number of participants which have confirmed - as such we can advise that this call will proceed as planned. Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability-WS2 On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Bernard Turcotte < turcotte.bernard(a)gmail.com> wrote: > All, > > We currently only have 3 confirmations of attendance to this call. > > As noted last week the deadline for confirmations is Tuesday 13 February > 0700 UTC - if we fail to obtain the 5 confirmations of attendance we will > be forced to cancel this call. > > Thank you. > > > Bernard Turcotte > ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability-WS2 >

1 0

CCWG-Accountability-WS2 Meeting Wednesday 14 February 1900 UTC - Reminder to confirm
by Bernard Turcotte Feb. 11, 2018

Feb. 11, 2018

All, We currently only have 3 confirmations of attendance to this call. As noted last week the deadline for confirmations is Tuesday 13 February 0700 UTC - if we fail to obtain the 5 confirmations of attendance we will be forced to cancel this call. Thank you. Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability-WS2

1 0

CCWG-Accountability-WS2-Jurisdiction - Meeting Wednesday 14 February 1900 UTC
by Bernard Turcotte Feb. 9, 2018

Feb. 9, 2018

All, As stated in the note to the plenary earlier this week we require confirmation of attendance from at least 5 participants 36 hours prior to a call to confirm holding a sub-group call (see below). We currently only have on 1 confirmation for the next Jurisdiction call and will have to cancel it if we do not receive the required number of confirmations by Tuesday 13 February 0700 UTC . Thank You. Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support for the CCWG-Accountability-WS2 ========================= All, Here is a summary of the WS2 associated meetings for the week of 12 February. Please note that if a confirmation of attendance is requested and less than 5 participants confirm 36 hours prior that this call will be cancelled (this message replaces all the individual sub-group requests for confirmation of attendance - your single reply may indicate participation in any or all of these meetings - no need to send confirmations per individual meetings - we need to provide 24 hour notice of cancellation of calls to avoid certain costs). - Monday 12 February 1900 UTC - Ombuds IOO sub-group meeting - Please confirm participation bu Sunday 11 February 0700 UTC - Wednesdday 14 February 0500 UTC - Staff Accountability sub-group meeting - Please confirm participation by Sunday 11 February 1700 UTC - Wednesday 14 February 1300 UTC - Plenary - Note this meeting may be cancelled - confirmation, or it being held or cancelled, will be sent Monday 12 February. - Wednesday 14 February 1900 UTC - Jurisdiction sub-group meeting - Please confirm participation by Tuesday 13 February 0700 UTC - Thursday 15 February 1300 UTC - Diversity sub-group meeting - Please confirm participation by Wednesday February 14 0100 UTC. Thank You

1 0

Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] [GAC] Comments of the Italian Government on the jurisdiction report
by Kavouss Arasteh Feb. 8, 2018

Feb. 8, 2018

Dear Greg, I would like to reiterate that all comments received pursuant to public comment procedure including those from France, Italy, Russia and initial comments during CCWG forum made by Iran and Brazil need to be included in the introductory part of the report Last but not least the part contained in the initial report under " further consideration " as well as three " Stress Tests " must also be referred to in the final report to plenary of CCWG I was unable to attend last night call ( 07 Feb,) as I was in the plane from Seoul to Geneva. CCWG must be aware of all comments Regards Kavouss On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Rita Forsi <rita.forsi(a)mise.gov.it> wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > Echoing my French colleague, I would like to bring the Italian comments on > the jurisdiction report to your attention. > > Thank you > > Best Regards, > > Rita Forsi > > *Rita Forsi* > > *Direttore Generale* > > *Istituto Superiore delle Comunicazioni * > > *e delle Tecnologie dell' Informazione* > > *v.le America, 201* > > *00144 Roma* > > *tel. +390654442360 <+39%2006%205444%202360>* > > *fax +390654442020 <+39%2006%205444%202020>* > > > ------------------------------ > > *Da:* gacPer conto diRAHMOUNI Dalila > *Inviato:* lunedì 5 febbraio 2018 17:19:26 ((UTC + 1.00 h) Amsterdam, > Berlino, Berna, Roma, Stoccolma, Vienna > *A:* 'ws2-jurisdiction' > *Cc:* gac(a)icann.org; gregshatanipc(a)gmail.com > *Oggetto:* [GAC] Comments of the French Government on the jurisdiction > report > > Dear colleagues, > > > > Please find attached the comments of the French Government (and a short > translation below) on the jurisdiction report. > > > > We have send these comments for the public consultation and we would like > to insist for integrate these comments into the report of the jurisdiction > subgroup. > > > > “The French government thanks the sub-group in charge of the jurisdiction > for the many efforts made to advance this crucial issue to strengthen the > accountability of ICANN to the entire multi-stakeholder community. Since > its launch in June 2016, the Jurisdiction sub-group has had deep > disagreements among members, which reflect a wide divergence of views on > the group's mandate, its objectives and the scope of possible solutions. > > > > Although the proposals of the ICANN Jurisdiction Report go in the right > direction, the French Government believes that they will not be sufficient > to truly address the issues raised by the unilateral exercise of a > particular jurisdiction over a particular jurisdiction. organization whose > mandate is to manage a global common good, the system of domain names. > > > > Currently, ICANN is an entity under US law, which has many implications > for ICANN's accountability to equality between different stakeholders. > Indeed, this status implies that ICANN's activities remain governed by the > right of only one State, that of the United States, and that US > jurisdictions have jurisdiction ex officio. However, the goal of improving > ICANN's accountability to the entire Internet community means that its > legal accountability to all stakeholders without any one being favored over > another and no country in the world. particular, directly or indirectly, in > the full realization by ICANN of its global public. > > > > Given the strong divergences within the sub-working group, the French > government encourages members to explore new solutions, in particular > proposing to introduce immunities, in particular partial immunities, from > jurisdiction to ICANN in order to guarantee its autonomy and its > accountability to the entire global Internet community.” > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > Best, > > > > > _______________________________________________ > gac mailing list > gac(a)gac.icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac > >

1 0

Recordings, DAIRs, Raw Caption Notes for Jurisdiction Subgroup Meeting #54 | 7 February 2018
by MSSI Secretariat Feb. 7, 2018

Feb. 7, 2018

Hello all, Please find the recordings, Decisions, Action Items, Requests (DAIRs), and raw caption notes for CCWG Accountability WS2 Jurisdiction Subgroup Meeting #54 – 7 February 2018 posted at https://community.icann.org/x/dwa8B The transcript will be posted on when it becomes available (usually in 3 to 5 business days after the call). A copy of the DAIRs and raw caption notes may be found below. Thank you. With kind regards, Brenda Brewer, Projects & Operations Assistant Multistakeholder Strategy & Strategic Initiatives (MSSI) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) [cid:image001.png@01D3A026.2098E9D0] Action Items: * GS – will produce and updated draft of the recommendations for the next meeting. * NCSG Participants requested to provide draft language with respect to comment 6.03 in the Google doc and advise the list. * Staff to schedule calls for weeks of 20 and 26 February and send calendar invites. Raw Captioning Notes Disclaimer: This rough edit transcript, which may contain missing, misspelled or paraphrased words, is only provided for your immediate review and is not certified as verbatim and is not to be cited in any way. * Word Doc<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79431287/CCWG-Accountabili…> * PDF<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79431287/CCWG-Accountabili…> Decisions: * Schedule calls for the weeks of 20 and 26 February * Schedule call for 1900 UTC 14 February for 90 minutes. * Review of comments on next call will begin with comment 6.05 Requests: * (none) Next Meeting: * Wednesday 14 February 1900 UTC.

1 0

Fwd: Documents for Jurisdiction Meeting
by Greg Shatan Feb. 7, 2018

Feb. 7, 2018

All, Here are documents for the upcoming meeting. Greg ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gregory S. Shatan <gshatan(a)mosessinger.com> Date: Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 1:56 PM Subject: Documents for Jurisdiction Meeting To: gregshatanipc(a)gmail.com <gregshatanipc(a)gmail.com> _________________________________________________________________ This message is being sent from a Law Firm and may contain CONFIDENTIAL or PRIVILEGED information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not print, copy or distribute this message or any attachments. Advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail, and delete this message and attachments without retaining a copy. *Disclaimer* The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by *Mimecast Ltd*, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a *safer* and *more useful* place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more Click Here <http://www.mimecast.com/products/>.

1 0