But the insistence that no question that could uncover a fact that might lead to consideration of other jurisdictions is to be allowed, argues otherwise. <<
I am all in favor of questions that aim to develop relevant documented facts rather than unsubstantiated opinions, as only the former can identify actual problems possibly requiring responsive solutions. Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal Virtualaw LLC 1155 F Street, NW Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20004 202-559-8597/Direct 202-559-8750/Fax 202-255-6172/Cell Twitter: @VlawDC "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey -----Original Message----- From: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of avri doria Sent: Monday, January 02, 2017 6:19 PM To: ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org Subject: Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] Staying Focused in the Jurisdiction Subgroup On 02-Jan-17 17:56, Phil Corwin wrote:
In response to this statement: I see the sharp focus by those who want to prevent particular solutions from even seeming possible, as motivating a drive to keep us from asking necessary questions
Respectfully, there can be no "particular solutions" until we have identified and documented actual problems, as in the absence of such problems proposed "solutions" are little more than changes advocated for their own sake or to further an unrelated agenda.
With equal respect, I agree this should not be the case. But the insistence that no question that could uncover a fact that might lead to consideration of other jurisdictions is to be allowed, argues otherwise. avri --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus _______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2016.0.7924 / Virus Database: 4739/13633 - Release Date: 12/22/16 Internal Virus Database is out of date.