+1 The same thing would apply no matter where ICANN is incorporated. Indeed, this is not a statement of exclusion -- ICANN has the same obligations wherever it does business. P Paul Rosenzweig paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com O: +1 (202) 547-0660 M: +1 (202) 329-9650 VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739 www.redbranchconsulting.com My PGP Key: https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684 -----Original Message----- From: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Nigel Roberts Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 12:25 PM To: ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org Subject: Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] Pool.com case summary Similar provisions would apply in European countries, including checks on terrorist and criminal financing, and moneylaundering. ICANN has to follow the law of wherever it is located. I find this preferable to ICANN being immune to the consequences of its own misfeasance and/or negligence On 07/04/17 16:07, parminder wrote:
What do you make of the following passage from
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction