Here is the sheet with the documented issues: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zAMj3Oz8TEqbjauOyqt09Ef-1ada9TrC7i60... It took me 10 seconds to find it. Here is the page where all the docs are displayed: https://community.icann.org/display/WEIA/Jurisdiction There is no need to contact the chair to find documents. You can contact ICANN staff for updated materials if you cannot find them on the WS2 page which I pasted above. I look forward to more substantive discussions on actual issues. Farzaneh On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 3:20 AM, parminder <parminder@itforchange.net> wrote:
On Saturday 12 August 2017 11:37 AM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
Hello Greg,
If I recall correctly there was a call to log issues twice now. Can you provide the URL where the issues are documented for people to pick from OR are you suggesting to hit another reset and start logging issues again?
Regards PS: I hope I will get a response this time as I don't get response from you including when I even write you privately to remind you of my question.
To add to this, I asked for the original issues doc twice, and quite pointedly the second time in a separate email, to which Jorge responded also asking for it, and reminding that he too had asked for it earlier once.
This is the most extra-ordinary chair-ship of a working group that I have ever witnessed! Why dont we just get told what report we have to sign off on and close the matters.
parminder
Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On Aug 12, 2017 12:13 AM, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
Jurisdiction Subgroup Members,
As explained by Staff at our last meeting on 9 August, we have until *11 October* to submit a draft set of recommendations to the Plenary for consideration as a first reading if any such recommendations are to be accepted by the Plenary, published for Public Consultation and included in the Final WS2 Report.
In other words, we have about *8 weeks* to develop a draft set of recommendations and come to consensus on these.
Obviously, given this time-frame, we have to accept that we will not be able to address all issues. In fact, the only realistic approach, if we want to deliver any recommendations, is to pick a handful of issues (2 to 4) on which we can all agree and for which we believe we can propose recommendations that will achieve consensus.
I remain optimistic that we can do this if we can agree, meaning everyone will have to compromise, to select this limited number of issues over the next very few weeks and work diligently at meetings and on the list to develop recommendations for these.
To reach this objective I would propose the following approach:
- *Each participant should pick one issue which they believe is in scope for us and post that issue to the list prior to our meeting of 23 August. More specifically:* - *Issues should be very specific -- avoid open-ended, abstract or omnibus issues* - *Issue description should be succinct -- 12 standard lines maximum* - *Proposed solutions – if you have a possible solution or recommendation which should be considered, please include it (again, being succinct).* - *Put your issue in a new email (not a reply), with the subject ISSUE: [name of issue]* - *The sooner, the better*
I look forward to discussing this proposal at our next meeting of *16 August* and I would encourage participants to comment on this proposal in response to this email prior to that meeting.
Greg
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing listWs2-jurisdiction@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction