First reaction This is well-written and an excellent start. I did find the footnotes highly confusing - particularly the presence of half of footnote 6 on the next page, and I was thoroughly confused by footnote 7. But these are minor issues. A suggestion: I think it would be helpful to share this with the ccNSO Council, for early comment and feedback from Council and the wider ccTLD community, either now, or following further revision. The text is understandably specific about gTLD aspects, but relatively silent about ccTLD aspects - and the work of PTI has been directly affected by recent re-interpretations of OFAC by ICANN. I personally think a similar exposition of how the IANA deals with ccTLDs to match the RAA specifics would be required for full coverage of the issues. I'd be interested in the view of the Chair of the subgroup on the appropriate liaison procedure here. Nigel Roberts (ccNSO Council Member, EU region) On 30/08/17 08:37, Greg Shatan wrote:
All,
As mentioned on the Plenary Call, the attached first draft recommendation regarding OFAC, assembled from the input of various participants, will be reviewed on the Subgroup call.
The Agenda will be amended accordingly.
I look forward to comments from the Subgroup.irst
GregF
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction