On 02-Jan-17 17:56, Phil Corwin wrote:
In response to this statement: I see the sharp focus by those who want to prevent particular solutions from even seeming possible, as motivating a drive to keep us from asking necessary questions
Respectfully, there can be no "particular solutions" until we have identified and documented actual problems, as in the absence of such problems proposed "solutions" are little more than changes advocated for their own sake or to further an unrelated agenda.
With equal respect, I agree this should not be the case. But the insistence that no question that could uncover a fact that might lead to consideration of other jurisdictions is to be allowed, argues otherwise. avri --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus