Hello Parminder, I just looked at the agenda and can't seem to find the "one man one issue" you refer? That said, if that indeed has been proposed by the Chair then I agree that it isn't appropriate. Infact I don't see why anyone should be formerly tagged with issues raised except where there might be need for clarification. I am of the opinion that there should be no limit to issues to be raised so long as they are within scope. The subgroup should own whatever issues raised and address them as such. Regards Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos On Aug 16, 2017 6:02 AM, "parminder" <parminder@itforchange.net> wrote:
I disagree with the plan of one person one issue -- it is not a set of entitlements that one is asking for oneself that these can be so distributed, in an apparently democratic manner. These are issues that are being raised on the behalf of the global public, and must be judged on their merit, and not count.
This said, I will still frame one issue and send it along presently ... parminder
On Wednesday 16 August 2017 08:53 AM, Greg Shatan wrote:
All,
Here is the agenda and accompanying documents for tomorrow's meeting.
I look forward to our call.
Greg
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing listWs2-jurisdiction@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction