Aug. 23, 2017
12:19 p.m.
It's not that hard to find the ratio of the appeal court judgment, it seems to me. But then, I followed the case in detail. It appears to be: "If domain names are property (which this court in rendering this judgment has not found it necessary to rule upon) then, by the admissions of both Judgment Creditor and Third Party Garnishee (the Judgment Debtor not entering appearance), they cannot be property of a form that may be attached in the District of Columbia." Or in short, "domain names may not be attached in DC". It is authority for no other proposition. On 23/08/17 13:0s7, farzaneh badii wrote:
I think the important thing to find out is whether the court case in .IR is precedential.