I don't understand what your point is, apart from painting me as a perfectionist (I'm actually quite the opposite, but it's not a bad thing to say about me). It's really simply. If this WG ends up proposing that ICANN acquires any form of immunity from suit for any of its acts, or their consequences I, and a number of others (OUTSIDE the US) will strongly oppose that. On 21/08/17 12:19, Arasteh wrote:
DearAll Some of our respectful and distinguished colleagues may be perfectionist to the extent that they wish to ignore all constructive and possible solutions They raise questions and questions to every suggestions rather than complementing solutions to address their concerns I am sorry to be so transparent and open with advance apology Kavouss
Sent from my iPhone
On 21 Aug 2017, at 13:08, parminder <parminder@itforchange.net <mailto:parminder@itforchange.net>> wrote:
On Monday 21 August 2017 04:29 PM, Nigel Roberts wrote:
And what will ICANN then be immune from?
Milton put it nicely, to quote, "...from the vagaries of U.S. foreign policy or other laws and policies that would circumvent ICANN’s accountability to its global MS community."
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org <mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction