Good point Nigel, indeed. De : ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org] De la part de Bernard Turcotte Envoyé : lundi 3 avril 2017 15:52 À : Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net> Cc : ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org> Objet : Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] Pool.com case summary Re Quebec = correct. B. On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net <mailto:nigel@channelisles.net> > wrote: For the avoidance of imprecision or possible confusion, with (most of) Canada being a common-law, and not a civil law jurisdiction, I submit that governing law should, for preference, might better be expressed simply as "Canadian Law" or perhaps "British Columbia law". These were, of course, civil *proceedings*, under Canadian law but that's not civil law. (I think Quebec has a civilian system, however?) On 03/04/17 14:29, Mathieu Weill wrote: Dear Colleagues, Here is another summary form for the Pool.com vs ICANN case. It’s an interesting case because it was the only one documented as submitted in front of a non-US court. However it was settled before it reached the decision stage. Best, -- ***************************** Mathieu WEILL AFNIC - directeur général Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06 <tel:%2B33%201%2039%2030%2083%2006> mathieu.weill@afnic.fr <mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr> <mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr <mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr> > Twitter : @mathieuweill ***************************** _______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org <mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction _______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org <mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction