Re Quebec = correct. B. On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net> wrote:
For the avoidance of imprecision or possible confusion, with (most of) Canada being a common-law, and not a civil law jurisdiction, I submit that governing law should, for preference, might better be expressed simply as "Canadian Law" or perhaps "British Columbia law".
These were, of course, civil *proceedings*, under Canadian law but that's not civil law. (I think Quebec has a civilian system, however?)
On 03/04/17 14:29, Mathieu Weill wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
Here is another summary form for the Pool.com vs ICANN case. It’s an interesting case because it was the only one documented as submitted in front of a non-US court. However it was settled before it reached the decision stage.
Best,
-- ***************************** Mathieu WEILL AFNIC - directeur général Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06 mathieu.weill@afnic.fr <mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr> Twitter : @mathieuweill *****************************
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction