I support this formulation, thanks. Mike Rodenbaugh RODENBAUGH LAW tel/fax: +1.415.738.8087 http://rodenbaugh.com On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
All:
Based on discussions on our last call and the list, I've revised these questions as follows (added text underlined). Please reply to this email with any comments or suggested changes.
Greg
1. Has your business, your privacy or your ability to use or purchase DNS-related services been affected by ICANN's jurisdiction* in any way?
If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant documents. Please note that *“affected”* may *refer to *positive *and/*or negative *effects*.
2. Has ICANN's jurisdiction* affected any dispute resolution process or litigation related to domain names you have been involved in?
If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant documents. Please note that *“affected”* may *refer to* positive *and/*or negative *effects*.
3. Do you have copies of and/or links to any *verifiable* reports of experiences of other parties that would be responsive to the questions above?
If the answer is yes, please provide these copies and/or links.
_____________________________
* For these questions, “ICANN’s jurisdiction” refers to (a) ICANN being subject to U.S. and California law as a result of its incorporation and location in California, (b) ICANN being subject to the laws of any other country as a result of its location or contacts with that country, or (c) any “choice of law” or venue provisions in agreements with ICANN.
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction