Dear Greg, Dear All, I notice that the text you added is slightly different from the version that was agreed on the plenary. The text that was agreed to be added to the last part of that session was as follows: The suggestion added to the report that “Further Discussions of Jurisdiction-Related Concerns” are needed was echoed in several comments subsequently received. These comments did not bring any changes to the report, recognizing that the need for “further discussions” to address unresolved concerns, including in other fora, had already been acknowledged. Feel free to check the transcript. Best, Thiago ________________________________ De: Ws2-jurisdiction [ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org] em nome de Greg Shatan [gregshatanipc@gmail.com] Enviado: sexta-feira, 9 de março de 2018 15:14 Para: ws2-jurisdiction Cc: ACCT-Staff (acct-staff@icann.org) Assunto: [Ws2-jurisdiction] Jurisdiction Red Line for Second Reading All, This includes the proposed change discussed this morning We'll need to confirm that I've accurately captured the end point of that discussion. I also did some clean-up regarding "qualified" and "agreed." Greg -- Esta mensagem foi verificada pelas ferramentas de detecção de ataques do Ministério e nenhuma ameaça cibernética foi encontrada. Não obstante, recomenda-se cautela, especialmente se solicitar dados pessoais e senhas ou se contiver anexos.