Here's my paste again so it is available to all: The suggestion added to the report that “Further Discussions of Jurisdiction-Related Concerns” are needed was echoed in several comments subsequently received. These comments did not bring any changes to the report, recognizing that the need for “further discussions” to address unresolved concerns, including in other fora, had already been acknowledged. Cheers Jordan On 9 March 2018 at 14:14, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
This includes the proposed change discussed this morning We'll need to confirm that I've accurately captured the end point of that discussion. I also did some clean-up regarding "qualified" and "agreed."
Greg
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
-- *Jordan Carter* Group Chief Executive InternetNZ Office: +64 4 495 2118 <04-495%202118> | Mobile: +64 21 442 649 <021%20442%20649> | Skype: jordancarter Email: jordan@internetnz.net.nz *A better world through a better Internet *