MEMBER POLL ON PROPOSED QUESTIONS FOR QUESTIONNAIRE
All Members: Here is the link to the poll to determine support for each of the proposed questions for the questionnaire discussed on our last two calls. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScaMJ8CKRafytThamnj7YcmgdHB0Kpe9-8x... The poll is very short and should only take a few minutes of your time. Please complete the poll before our call on Tuesday, December 13 at 13:00 UTC. Thank you. Greg Shatan
Grec, I understand that you may discuss or at least inform the sub group of the results of POLL. In that case ,Please kindly indicate for each reply the persons and its affiliation as it is important to know to what extent the responders are representing the global community multistakeholder and NOT stakeholder of a handful number of countries mostly Regards Kavouss 2016-12-12 3:58 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
All Members:
Here is the link to the poll to determine support for each of the proposed questions for the questionnaire discussed on our last two calls.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScaMJ8CKRafytThamnj7Ycm gdHB0Kpe9-8x34LkUIdLjD4H6Q/viewform
The poll is very short and should only take a few minutes of your time. Please complete the poll before our call on Tuesday, December 13 at 13:00 UTC.
Thank you.
Greg Shatan
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
Kavouss, I will take this as a request to provide the record of who participated in the poll and what their answers were. This seems appropriate since this is available when we do "checks and crosses." We did not collect information on the responders' "affiliation" or who they "represent," so I would have no basis to give this information. (Note: I don't think we have any responder who represents "the global community [of] multistakeholders.") In any event, each member has equal standing in the subgroup and their response will therefore count equally. Best regards, Greg On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
Grec, I understand that you may discuss or at least inform the sub group of the results of POLL. In that case ,Please kindly indicate for each reply the persons and its affiliation as it is important to know to what extent the responders are representing the global community multistakeholder and NOT stakeholder of a handful number of countries mostly Regards Kavouss
2016-12-12 3:58 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
All Members:
Here is the link to the poll to determine support for each of the proposed questions for the questionnaire discussed on our last two calls.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScaMJ8CKRafytThamnj 7YcmgdHB0Kpe9-8x34LkUIdLjD4H6Q/viewform
The poll is very short and should only take a few minutes of your time. Please complete the poll before our call on Tuesday, December 13 at 13:00 UTC.
Thank you.
Greg Shatan
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
Grec, I do not understnd your statement. In order to maintain the proper representation of various responder ,we need to know their affiliation as only those official Members of CCWG WS 2 should be counted as they were nominated by chartering organizations . PLS KINDLY RESPECT THE PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE POLL APPROACH Regards Kavouss 2016-12-12 21:00 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
Kavouss,
I will take this as a request to provide the record of who participated in the poll and what their answers were. This seems appropriate since this is available when we do "checks and crosses."
We did not collect information on the responders' "affiliation" or who they "represent," so I would have no basis to give this information. (Note: I don't think we have any responder who represents "the global community [of] multistakeholders.")
In any event, each member has equal standing in the subgroup and their response will therefore count equally.
Best regards,
Greg
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Kavouss Arasteh < kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
Grec, I understand that you may discuss or at least inform the sub group of the results of POLL. In that case ,Please kindly indicate for each reply the persons and its affiliation as it is important to know to what extent the responders are representing the global community multistakeholder and NOT stakeholder of a handful number of countries mostly Regards Kavouss
2016-12-12 3:58 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
All Members:
Here is the link to the poll to determine support for each of the proposed questions for the questionnaire discussed on our last two calls.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScaMJ8CKRafytThamnj 7YcmgdHB0Kpe9-8x34LkUIdLjD4H6Q/viewform
The poll is very short and should only take a few minutes of your time. Please complete the poll before our call on Tuesday, December 13 at 13:00 UTC.
Thank you.
Greg Shatan
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
Kavouss, I believe you are incorrect with regard to how subgroups work. In the subgroups, all participants are equal. Since members and participants were allowed to choose their own subgroups, there is no "proper representation" in or for any subgroup. All subgroup participants have an equal voice, in the group and in the poll. However, since you have included the co-chairs, I'm sure they can weigh in as well. Greg On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
Grec, I do not understnd your statement. In order to maintain the proper representation of various responder ,we need to know their affiliation as only those official Members of CCWG WS 2 should be counted as they were nominated by chartering organizations . PLS KINDLY RESPECT THE PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE POLL APPROACH Regards Kavouss
2016-12-12 21:00 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
Kavouss,
I will take this as a request to provide the record of who participated in the poll and what their answers were. This seems appropriate since this is available when we do "checks and crosses."
We did not collect information on the responders' "affiliation" or who they "represent," so I would have no basis to give this information. (Note: I don't think we have any responder who represents "the global community [of] multistakeholders.")
In any event, each member has equal standing in the subgroup and their response will therefore count equally.
Best regards,
Greg
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Kavouss Arasteh < kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
Grec, I understand that you may discuss or at least inform the sub group of the results of POLL. In that case ,Please kindly indicate for each reply the persons and its affiliation as it is important to know to what extent the responders are representing the global community multistakeholder and NOT stakeholder of a handful number of countries mostly Regards Kavouss
2016-12-12 3:58 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
All Members:
Here is the link to the poll to determine support for each of the proposed questions for the questionnaire discussed on our last two calls.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScaMJ8CKRafytThamnj 7YcmgdHB0Kpe9-8x34LkUIdLjD4H6Q/viewform
The poll is very short and should only take a few minutes of your time. Please complete the poll before our call on Tuesday, December 13 at 13:00 UTC.
Thank you.
Greg Shatan
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
Dear All, I do not understand the usefulness of such poll when the majority are those who attend every and all meetings mostly from one country. This does not represent multi stakeholder but single stakeholder. The approach much conform to the CCWG charter . It is important to know the affiliation of those participating in the poll. We need to know the rules of the game. If a simple majority is involve that majorité from a single country that is not multistakeholder at all Regards Kavouss 2016-12-12 22:11 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
Kavouss,
I believe you are incorrect with regard to how subgroups work. In the subgroups, all participants are equal. Since members and participants were allowed to choose their own subgroups, there is no "proper representation" in or for any subgroup. All subgroup participants have an equal voice, in the group and in the poll.
However, since you have included the co-chairs, I'm sure they can weigh in as well.
Greg
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Kavouss Arasteh < kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
Grec, I do not understnd your statement. In order to maintain the proper representation of various responder ,we need to know their affiliation as only those official Members of CCWG WS 2 should be counted as they were nominated by chartering organizations . PLS KINDLY RESPECT THE PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE POLL APPROACH Regards Kavouss
2016-12-12 21:00 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
Kavouss,
I will take this as a request to provide the record of who participated in the poll and what their answers were. This seems appropriate since this is available when we do "checks and crosses."
We did not collect information on the responders' "affiliation" or who they "represent," so I would have no basis to give this information. (Note: I don't think we have any responder who represents "the global community [of] multistakeholders.")
In any event, each member has equal standing in the subgroup and their response will therefore count equally.
Best regards,
Greg
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Kavouss Arasteh < kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
Grec, I understand that you may discuss or at least inform the sub group of the results of POLL. In that case ,Please kindly indicate for each reply the persons and its affiliation as it is important to know to what extent the responders are representing the global community multistakeholder and NOT stakeholder of a handful number of countries mostly Regards Kavouss
2016-12-12 3:58 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
All Members:
Here is the link to the poll to determine support for each of the proposed questions for the questionnaire discussed on our last two calls.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScaMJ8CKRafytThamnj 7YcmgdHB0Kpe9-8x34LkUIdLjD4H6Q/viewform
The poll is very short and should only take a few minutes of your time. Please complete the poll before our call on Tuesday, December 13 at 13:00 UTC.
Thank you.
Greg Shatan
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
participants (2)
-
Greg Shatan -
Kavouss Arasteh