Kavouss, I will take this as a request to provide the record of who participated in the poll and what their answers were. This seems appropriate since this is available when we do "checks and crosses." We did not collect information on the responders' "affiliation" or who they "represent," so I would have no basis to give this information. (Note: I don't think we have any responder who represents "the global community [of] multistakeholders.") In any event, each member has equal standing in the subgroup and their response will therefore count equally. Best regards, Greg On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
Grec, I understand that you may discuss or at least inform the sub group of the results of POLL. In that case ,Please kindly indicate for each reply the persons and its affiliation as it is important to know to what extent the responders are representing the global community multistakeholder and NOT stakeholder of a handful number of countries mostly Regards Kavouss
2016-12-12 3:58 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
All Members:
Here is the link to the poll to determine support for each of the proposed questions for the questionnaire discussed on our last two calls.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScaMJ8CKRafytThamnj 7YcmgdHB0Kpe9-8x34LkUIdLjD4H6Q/viewform
The poll is very short and should only take a few minutes of your time. Please complete the poll before our call on Tuesday, December 13 at 13:00 UTC.
Thank you.
Greg Shatan
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction