Thank you Steve. I have added 3 more recommendations on the *Accountability* and *regarding Updates to SO/AC/Subgroup Policies and Procedures* and inserted them in the doc. We can discuss them during the call. There are two overall suggestions that I am putting out there for the group to discuss and if the group agrees I can insert them in the document after the meeting or discard them: *- SO/AC of the year with regards to accountability * This was my attempt to make an inspirational recommendation. The SO/AC of the year does not create a negative fierce competition between the SOs and ACs and can be a good excuse to look at the accountability mechanisms we have in place. There might be downsides to it which surpass the positive values it brings. But we can at least discuss it. *- Annual Report on accountability mechanisms* SO and ACs provide an annual report on what they have done during the year to enhance their accountability and where they might have fallen short and what they did to overcome it. we can discuss these two recommendations plus what I have added to the document (attached) during our meeting. Best Farzaneh Farzaneh On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org> wrote:
Thanks for the reviewing that many of you have already done. (not so much over last 4 days, however …)
In the attached docs/PDF for version 1.3, dated 28-Feb-2017:
We added previously provided responses from the RSSAC.
Added a mention of the Bylaws required independent review of AC/Sos other than the GAC. (page 3)
Added a placeholder for Executive Summary
Here are ways you can continue to suggest edits:
1. Reply all with an email offering comments.
2. Mark-up the attached Word Doc Draft 1.3 (use track changes, please).
3. Suggest edits or comments on the Google Doc Draft 1.3 at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WppuLbVxfrRBx09hyDVYwj_ yeyW78M7esiSv9InmK8U/edit?usp=sharing
—Steve, Cheryl, and Farzi