Draft transparency review for SOAC Subgroup Meeting # 18, on 26-Jan-2017
On our 19-Jan-2017 call, I offered to draft a review of one aspect of accountability — Transparency: Steve DelBianco: Once we have described best practices, our "review" could identify AC/SOs coudl benefit from moving towards the best practices. THAT could be our "recommendation. that is, we compare each AC/SO against the Best Practices, and not against each other Kavouss suggests a linear approach, ie take one question at a time in our next calls and analyze the responses to test the methodology, If we do that, let's start with an easier question, e.g. Transparency. Attached is my 3-page draft review and recommendations for transparency of each SOAC and subgroups that provided responses. Hope we can discuss on our next call. —Steve — Steve DelBianco Executive Director NetChoice http://www.NetChoice.org<http://www.netchoice.org/> +1.703.615.6206
Thanks Steve - an straightforward and useful approach. Matthew On 26/01/2017 01:30, Steve DelBianco wrote:
On our 19-Jan-2017 call, I offered to draft a review of one aspect of accountability — *Transparency*:
Steve DelBianco:**Once we have described best practices, our "review" could identify AC/SOs coudl benefit from moving towards the best practices. THAT could be our "recommendation.**that is, we compare each AC/SO against the Best Practices, and not against each other
Kavouss suggests a linear approach, ie take one question at a time in our next calls and analyze the responses to test the methodology,
If we do that, let's start with an easier question, e.g. Transparency.
Attached is my 3-page draft review and recommendations for transparency of each SOAC and subgroups that provided responses.
Hope we can discuss on our next call.
—Steve
— Steve DelBianco Executive Director NetChoice http://www.NetChoice.org <http://www.netchoice.org/> +1.703.615.6206
_______________________________________________ Ws2-so_ac mailing list Ws2-so_ac@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-so_ac
-- ------------ Matthew Shears Global Internet Policy and Human Rights Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT) + 44 771 2472987
Dear Steve, Thanks for this and sorry I could not attend the latest calls as I have been on the road quite a lot. Regarding the ccNSO, in your paper I read “All ccNSO Council decisions are immediately published on ccNSO website and wiki.” My recommendation would be to introduce a timeframe for any decisions and/or minute to be published on the ccNSO webpage as in the past I and other ccTLD community representatives noted a certain level of inconsistency in the way these items were shown on the ccNSO webpage from a time perspective. Just my two cents. Best, Giovanni Giovanni Seppia External Relations Manager EURid Woluwelaan 150 1831 Diegem - Belgium TEL: +32 (0) 2 401 2750 MOB:+39 335 8141733 giovanni.seppia@eurid.eu<mailto:giovanni.seppia@eurid.eu> http://www.eurid.eu<http://www.eurid.eu/> Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: ws2-so_ac-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-so_ac-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve DelBianco Sent: 26 January 2017 02:31 To: ws2-so_ac@icann.org Cc: MSSI Secretariat Subject: [Ws2-so_ac] Draft transparency review for SOAC Subgroup Meeting # 18, on 26-Jan-2017 On our 19-Jan-2017 call, I offered to draft a review of one aspect of accountability — Transparency: Steve DelBianco: Once we have described best practices, our "review" could identify AC/SOs coudl benefit from moving towards the best practices. THAT could be our "recommendation. that is, we compare each AC/SO against the Best Practices, and not against each other Kavouss suggests a linear approach, ie take one question at a time in our next calls and analyze the responses to test the methodology, If we do that, let's start with an easier question, e.g. Transparency. Attached is my 3-page draft review and recommendations for transparency of each SOAC and subgroups that provided responses. Hope we can discuss on our next call. —Steve — Steve DelBianco Executive Director NetChoice http://www.NetChoice.org<http://www.netchoice.org/> +1.703.615.6206 Disclaimer: This email and any attachment hereto is intended solely for the person to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately contact the sender by telephone or email, and destroy any copies of this information. You should not use or copy it, nor disclose its content to any other person or rely upon this information. Please note that any views presented in the email and any attachment hereto are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of EURid. While all care has been taken to avoid any known viruses, the recipient is advised to check this email and any attachment for presence of viruses. http://www.eurid.eu/en/legal-disclaimer
participants (3)
-
Giovanni Seppia -
matthew shears -
Steve DelBianco