On that note, I know I have been out of the loop for a little bit of time, but what about the concerns raised by the contracted parties? See https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/cph-to-icann-board-24fe... and ICANN response just published https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/marby-to-bunton-diaz-11.... I did not necessarily see them reflected in the document but there are very real issues and specific evidence has been provided (though redacted essentially from this last letter to not engage in ICANN bashing). Jeffrey J. Neuman Senior Vice President |Valideus USA | Com Laude USA 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600 Mclean, VA 22102, United States E: jeff.neuman@valideus.com or jeff.neuman@comlaude.com T: +1.703.635.7514 M: +1.202.549.5079 @Jintlaw -----Original Message----- From: ws2-staff_acct-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-staff_acct-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of avri doria Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 1:56 PM To: ws2-staff_acct@icann.org Subject: Re: [Ws2-staff_acct] Staff questionnaire to community On 19-Apr-17 08:47, George Sadowsky wrote:
In contrast, I think that what you, Jordan, are suggesting is that we start with a group of issues which are essentially hypotheses.
I do not think think this is the case. The issues were abstracted from the problems that people had reported. avri --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus _______________________________________________ Ws2-staff_acct mailing list Ws2-staff_acct@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-staff_acct