Hi, first, kudos Pari for this excellent piece. It should rise above these days' other noisy events and cause action from as many of us as possible. As Israel and Veni say, there is already good work being done by ISOC, ICANN, and also other organizations. It may be that we can contribute to scale it further and bring it to other stakeholders. We should also watch for moves from governments that to date have been friendly to the Internet and which may feel encouraged by the RCC, China, etc. governments as well as by the actions of large private Internet players. Key pieces at the core of the system like Network Neutrality and Section 230 may be under fire soon. That would play awfully into the hands of the parties striving for more governmental control and siloing behind national borders. Those of us who were involved and emerged from WSIS, early IGF, some WCITs and Plenipots, and national processes are obliged to transmit the institutional memory of these processes and their consequences - we could use more support but we certainly must come out and connect again. The mere thought of going through all that again - as is happening now - should send us out in high gear. ISOC, ICANN etc. must work in many layers and circles where we can help even in the face of governments inclined to follow the RCC's stance. Yours, Alejandro Pisanty On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 7:14 PM Ashton-Hart, Nick via wsis20 < wsis20@icann.org> wrote:
It’s a great idea, ISOC could help a great deal, especially as the IETF is one of the two pillars, along with the NRO/RIRs and ICANN.
We also have to make sure we keep the lid on efforts to move the IP stack to the ITU, which is likely to also be raised in this context.
For my part we’re also looking for think tanks to do events – expect to hear more of NY-based events along these lines soon
*Nick Ashton-Hart* *APCO* (m) +1 202 779 1072 <+12027791072>
Book time to meet with me here <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/ce911a0f9fa543dd9459b3a1392da25e@...>
On 2/5/25, 6:45 PM, "Remmy Nweke" <remmyn@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all
Since this is obviously a lacuna in the engagement processes, could ISOC global lead this part for the updating if not efforts at building the capacity of these new diplomats on the dangers as foreseen and probably make it a near regular engagement to abridge the likely noticeable gap on behalf of this multistakeholder community to save us all the headache of lacking proactive engagement and undue fightbacks.
Thanks to the eagle eyes within this community for spotting the unanticipated wrong route by RCC.
I think the earlier the better as it could take some processes to come to fruition.
___________________
REMMY NWEKE, *mNUJ, mNGE, mGOCOP, mnipr*
Lead Consulting Strategist - *DigitalSENSE Africa* <https://www.itrealms.com.ng/>
Group Executive Editor, *ITREALMS Media* group
[*Multiple-award winning medium*]
(ITREALMS <http://www.itrealms.com.ng/>, DigitalSENSE Business Magazine <http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng/businessnews>; NaijaAgroNet <http://www.naijaagronet.com.ng/>)
No. 36 Afariogun Street, Oshodi-Lagos, Nigeria M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558,
T: @ITRealms <http://www.twitter.com/ITRealms> @DigitalSENSEng
2024 *Nigeria DigitalSENSE Forum on IG4D*, Thursday June 27 <https://www.itrealms.com.ng/>
2024 *IT**REALMS* e-Waste Dialogue, Thursday December 14 <https://www.itrealms.com.ng/>
@Welcome Center Hotels, Int'l Airport Road, Lagos-Nigeria <http://welcomecentrehotels.com/>
Former Vice President, African Civil Society on Information Society (ACSIS)
______________________________________________________________
*Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and attachments are confidential and may also be privileged information. It is intended only for the use of the named recipient. Remmy Nweke does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately, then delete this document and do not disclose the contents of this document to any other person, nor make any copies. Violators may face court persecution.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 12:19 AM Israel Rosas via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org> wrote:
Hi all,
I echo Nick’s warnings about the need to engage with diplomats and share our vision. Although many on this list are long-term supporters of the multistakeholder model and the WSIS consensus, people new to the topic may not perceive the ideas we see in the RCC’s submission as unfeasible as we do, especially if giving some concessions in this field will let them advance other objectives. Let’s also bear in mind that, besides their level of expertise, diplomats usually deal with several topics in parallel, so WSIS+20—and the Internet—may not be at the core of their priorities.
Best,
Isra
Isra Rosas, Director, Partnerships and Internet Development Internet Society
*From: *Ashton-Hart, Nick via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org> *Date: *Wednesday, February 5, 2025 at 5:37 PM *To: *Dr Jimson Olufuye <jolufuye@kontemporary.net.ng>, Dr. Joseph Lorenzo Hall <hall@isoc.org> *Cc: *Pari Esfandiari via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org>, Tatiana Tropina < tropina@isoc.org> *Subject: *[wsis20] Re: RCC Pushes for State-Led Internet Governance Ahead of WSIS+20 Review
FYI all, while I suspect all of us on this list fundamentally disagree with the Russian position, they aren’t without supporters in New York – including China, though they’re much more subtle than Russia.
As someone based in New York who covers digital economy policy here, the policy leads handling the WSIS review are almost without exception entirely new to the subject. We have a very significant and heavy lift required to educate the diplomatic corps here on how critical it is that CIRs stay as they are, and respond to the criticisms that get levelled as well as explain why simple sounding solutions – like intergovernmental control of CIRs – aren’t really a solution to any problem on the Internet today.
I look forward to continued dialogue, and I’m sure seeing many long-time connections along the way to the review conclusion in December!
Best, Nick
* Nick Ashton-Hart* Senior Director, Digital Economy Policy
*APCO* *Temporary Address:*
275 Seventh Avenue, 21st Floor
New York, NY 10001 USA
(t) +1 202 778 1000 (m) +1 202 779 1072 <+12027791072> nashtonhart@apcoworldwide.com
Learn more about APCO on our website <https://apcoworldwide.com/?utm_campaign=email-signature&utm_source=apco&utm_...>
Book time to meet with me here <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/ce911a0f9fa543dd9459b3a1392da25e@...>
On 2/5/25, 5:20 PM, "Dr Jimson Olufuye via wsis20" <wsis20@icann.org> wrote:
Hi all,
Notwithstanding the misuse of the "public core" phrase, the RCC proposal is dead on arrival. It is against the spirit of the Geneva Declaration - WSIS Action Lines, the Tunis Agenda and the Pact for the Future - GDC, for multi-stakeholder engagement on Internet Governance and digital policy processes.
Let's remain vigilant though. Thanks, Pari for the highlight.
Cheers,
JO
On 2025-02-05 19:50, Dr. Joseph Lorenzo Hall via wsis20 wrote:
@Tatiana Tropina on our team pointed out yesterday the misuse of the term “public core” in the RCC submission.
That is, as folks here are likely aware of, the "public core" is a term originally defined by the Global Commission on the Stability of Cyberspace (GCSC) to refer to the essential technical infrastructure of the Internet, such as routing, naming systems, and physical transmission media. However, the RCC's submission uses the term more broadly and ambiguously, suggesting that it includes "critical resources" that must be managed and controlled, which rings a lot like discussions around “critical infrastructures” under the purview of governments.
This interpretation could justify greater government intervention in Internet infrastructure and operations, undermining the multistakeholder model and Internet freedom. It's important to note that the GCSC's definition was developed through a multistakeholder process and is widely accepted by the technical community.
The RCC's misuse of the "public core" concept is. We need to be vigilant in challenging this misuse and ensuring that the "public core" is understood and protected as the essential technical infrastructure of the Internet, not a wedge for multilateral dominance.
Best, Joe
--
JLH, Internet Society, hall@isoc.org ( https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjosephhall... <https://josephhall.org/> [4] )
From: Wolfgang Kleinwächter via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org> Date: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 at 08:40 To: Pari Esfandiari <pariesfandiari@gmail.com>, Pari Esfandiari via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org> Subject: [wsis20] Re: RCC Pushes for State-Led Internet Governance Ahead of WSIS+20 Review
Thanks Paris for pulling the RCC proposal into the broader public.
It is a tricky proposal. It includes some reasonable points, but it has a hidden agenda. It is misleading and confuses an uninformed public. Under Section 3 it argues: "The system of governance of global critical infrastructure must be equitable, neutral and immune to geopolitical challenges. The current multistkakeholder Internet Governance system does not fulfil these requirement." The first sentence needs all the support. The second sentence is not true.
After the IANA transition (2016) all stakeholders participate in ICANN as "equals" in their specific roles. The UN principle of "sovereign equality of states", a corner stone in international law and the UN charter, is fully resepcted and implemented in ICANN´s Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC). No single government has exceptional rights in ICANN. All governments are on "equal footing", as called for in the Tunis Agenda. And ICANN demonstrated, that it is "neutral and immune to geopolitical challenges".
A good example is from 2022. When Russia started its war against Ukraine, the Ukrainian Minister for Digital Policy wrote a letter to ICANN and was calling for the removal of the .ru. .rf (cyrillic) and .su top level domain zone files from the A-Root Server to disconnect Russia from the global Internet as a retaliation measure. Göran Marby, who was ICANN´s CEO in 2022, made clear in his answer, that ICANN will support Ukraine to remain connected to the Internet in difficult war times and will support the Internet community in Ukraine, but according to its bylaws and articles of incorproation, ICANN is not in a position to remove any TLD Zone Files from the A root server for political reasons, because ICANN is neutral and has to be "immune against geopolitical challenges".
To change this system would lead to a "system of governance of global critical infrastructure" which would loose its neutrality, become politisiezed and will be pulled into geopolitical conflicts.
Wolfgang
Pari Esfandiari via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org> hat am 05.02.2025 11:03 CET geschrieben:
This review of the RCC’s submission in the lead-up to the WSIS+20 examines its call for a state-led approach to Internet governance and its implications for the multistakeholder model. It explores how the RCC frames its arguments around digital sovereignty, interoperability, and regulatory frameworks while assessing the potential impact on global Internet governance structures, innovation, and access. Additionally, the article considers the broader geopolitical context of the submission and its alignment—or divergence—with international efforts to maintain an open, inclusive, and secure digital environment.
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcircleid.c... <https://circleid.com/posts/rcc-pushes-for-state-led-internet-governance-ahea...>
Cheers,
Pari
--
Pari Esfandiari
President
_Global TechnoPolitics Forum [1] _
_Pario [2]- Architects of Ideas_
info@TechnoPolitics.org
Linkedin Profile [3]
Tel: +1-202-735-1415 (Office)
: +1-310-435-0888 (Cell)
: +44-731-210-4049 (Cell)
_______________________________________________ Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources:
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.icann.o... <https://go.icann.org/wsis20> Read the public archives for this
mailing list: https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.o... <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann.... <https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy>) and the website Terms of Service ( https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann.... <https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Links: ------ [1] https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.technop... <http://www.technopolitics.org/> [2] https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.parioco... <http://www.parioconsultants.com/> [3] https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linked... <https://www.linkedin.com/in/pariesfandiari/> [4] https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjosephhall... <https://josephhall.org/> _______________________________________________
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.icann.o... <https://go.icann.org/wsis20>
Read the public archives for this mailing list:
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.o... <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/>
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann.... <https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy>) and the website Terms of Service
( https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann.... <https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.icann.o... <https://go.icann.org/wsis20>
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.o... <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/>
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann.... <https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy>) and the website Terms of Service ( https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann.... <https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
------------------------------
DATA HANDLING
For data handling questions, please view our Privacy Policy <https://apcoworldwide.com/privacy-policy/> or contact us at privacy@apcoworldwide.com <https://%20privacy@apcoworldwide.com/> with any inquiries.
CONFIDENTIALITY
This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or work product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
_______________________________________________
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Química UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .