Jordan, all, I do not support Jordan’s assessment as copied below at all. In fact, I consider it to be completely uncalled for, unfounded, offensive and as such far less constructive (or: far more destructive) than any reaction we have received from the board and ICANN staff so far. This is a fine example of the things that truly frustrate me in this process, not the many and seemingly endless calls at unholy hours. And, by the way, I do not like being lectured by “experts" Roelof Meijer From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Jordan Carter <jordan@internetnz.net.nz<mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz>> Date: maandag 7 september 2015 00:51 To: Carlos Gutierrez <crg@isoc-cr.org<mailto:crg@isoc-cr.org>> Cc: "avri@acm.org<mailto:avri@acm.org> (avri@acm.org<mailto:avri@acm.org>)" <avri@acm.org<mailto:avri@acm.org>>, Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Blog: Working Together Through The Last Mile It should not come as a surprise that ICANN's current structure does not want changes. Nothing is more natural in a change process than for those who see some loss of control or authority to oppose it. It is a very natural human reaction.