yes John, agree. rd Rudi Daniel *danielcharles consulting <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Kingstown-Saint-Vincent-and-the-Grenadines/DanielCharles/153611257984774>* On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 7:43 AM, John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org> wrote:
On Jul 14, 2016, at 5:53 PM, Drazek, Keith <kdrazek@verisign.com> wrote:
Agreed. Access to independent legal advice was never in question.
That said, in the interest of controlling costs, I have no problem seeking input from ICANN’s internal lawyers on issues that are deemed non-contentious or where potential conflicts do not exist.
Keith -
That is my view as well - no concerns with using the most-cost effective approach in the normal course of business, so long as that does not preclude access to independent counsel when requested by the CCWG.
/John
Disclaimers: my views alone - Accountability CCWG individual participant
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community