Leon, You are correct, I would like second read the Legal Sub Team / Legal Advisors during the time I can be available. I don't have a preference with the order of the rest of the agenda. greetings, el -- Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
On Mar 30, 2015, at 21:50, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx> wrote:
Dear Eberhard,
If I am understanding correctly you would like to have the Legal Subteam discussion first and then the Jurisdiction approach?
If that is the case, I have no objection.
Best regards,
León
El 30/03/2015, a las 12:55, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.na> escribió:
Can we move the Legal Subteam item forward on the agenda, please?
I have what they call a hard stop after one hour, and wish to participate in the Legal debate.
The GAO stuff needs a second read anyway so we'll sort that out next time. In order to speed this up it really would be helpful if the GAO document were provided in PDF.
EL
-- Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
On Mar 30, 2015, at 20:19, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all,
Below you will find a proposed agenda in preparation for your call #18 - Tuesday, 31 March – 06:00-08:00 UTC (time converter):
1. Welcome, roll-call, statement of interest 2. Confirm conclusions from Istanbul WP2 fundamental Bylaws Jurisdiction approach Legal Subteam working methods & input received WP1 community mechanism WP2 mission & core values, reconsideration process ST-WP progress and planning 3. Timeline Buenos Aires 4 Engagement 5. AOB
Thanks, Best regards Alice