Thomas Tks Yes we should try However,I have asked to add a new agenda item NOT under ANY OTHER BUSINESS, regarding how to examine the draft (para by para)as well as the approach used on transferring / transposing the agreed texts of Recommendations into the existing bylaw Please include this item in the agenda Kavouss Sent from my iPhone
On 7 Apr 2016, at 11:37, Thomas Rickert <thomas@rickert.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues, with this note, we would like to help you to prepare for the meeting more efficiently.
Bernie has kindly sent a document to the list with proposed responses and Mathieu has added an answer to question 25 a few hours ago, so you have all proposed answers in your inbox already.
We had discussed the questions 1 to 27 during the last call. Except for questions 2 and 25, the answers are very straightforward. We will present and explain the answers during the call so you can safely focus on other areas of the document.
Please take a look at questions 2 and 25. These are questions where we have tried to destill the essence of our discussion and prepare a response. You will hopefully agree that the proposed answers capture the views of the CCWG well.
Then there is a third area of questions from number 28 onwards. We have proposed answers to 28 to 34 that should be uncontroversial so we hope to be able to finish the discussion on the list of questions from the legal teams quickly. Number 35 and onwards are topics from our group. You might wish to read that in preparation of the call.
Thanks and tty soon.
Thomas
--
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community