preparation for the call today
Dear colleagues, with this note, we would like to help you to prepare for the meeting more efficiently. Bernie has kindly sent a document to the list with proposed responses and Mathieu has added an answer to question 25 a few hours ago, so you have all proposed answers in your inbox already. We had discussed the questions 1 to 27 during the last call. Except for questions 2 and 25, the answers are very straightforward. We will present and explain the answers during the call so you can safely focus on other areas of the document. Please take a look at questions 2 and 25. These are questions where we have tried to destill the essence of our discussion and prepare a response. You will hopefully agree that the proposed answers capture the views of the CCWG well. Then there is a third area of questions from number 28 onwards. We have proposed answers to 28 to 34 that should be uncontroversial so we hope to be able to finish the discussion on the list of questions from the legal teams quickly. Number 35 and onwards are topics from our group. You might wish to read that in preparation of the call. Thanks and tty soon. Thomas --
Thomas Tks Yes we should try However,I have asked to add a new agenda item NOT under ANY OTHER BUSINESS, regarding how to examine the draft (para by para)as well as the approach used on transferring / transposing the agreed texts of Recommendations into the existing bylaw Please include this item in the agenda Kavouss Sent from my iPhone
On 7 Apr 2016, at 11:37, Thomas Rickert <thomas@rickert.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues, with this note, we would like to help you to prepare for the meeting more efficiently.
Bernie has kindly sent a document to the list with proposed responses and Mathieu has added an answer to question 25 a few hours ago, so you have all proposed answers in your inbox already.
We had discussed the questions 1 to 27 during the last call. Except for questions 2 and 25, the answers are very straightforward. We will present and explain the answers during the call so you can safely focus on other areas of the document.
Please take a look at questions 2 and 25. These are questions where we have tried to destill the essence of our discussion and prepare a response. You will hopefully agree that the proposed answers capture the views of the CCWG well.
Then there is a third area of questions from number 28 onwards. We have proposed answers to 28 to 34 that should be uncontroversial so we hope to be able to finish the discussion on the list of questions from the legal teams quickly. Number 35 and onwards are topics from our group. You might wish to read that in preparation of the call.
Thanks and tty soon.
Thomas
--
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Dear Thomas, thank you for your note. As suggested, I have had a look at the proposed answers for questions 28 onwards (including the added questions that Bernard helpfully pointed out). In anticipation of the upcoming call in I wonder if question 29 - which deals with the applicability of the GAC carve out in case of removal of a NomCom-appointed Board member - might need closer examination. The suggested response is the following: No cause is needed for the removal of any Board member, regardless whether it is a NomCom Board member or not. Only an explanation needs to be offered. Therefore, no decision by the Board member is challenged with the removal procedure. As a consequence, the GAC carve-out should not apply to NomCom Board member removals. Given this response wouldn't it follow that the carve out does not apply to any removal of any Board member? And if that is the case how would the recall of the board be treated, given that it is defined as the removal of all Directors (other than the President) at the same time (under no. 3 of the additional questions)? Maybe we can look at this during the upcoming call. Kind regards Sabine Sabine Meyer International Digital and Postal Policy, Internet Governance Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy Villemombler Strasse 76, 53123 Bonn GERMANY Phone: +49 228 99615-2948 Fax: + 49 228 99615-2964 E-Mail: sabine.meyer@bmwi.bund.de Internet: http://www.bmwi.de -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Thomas Rickert Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. April 2016 11:37 An: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Betreff: [CCWG-ACCT] preparation for the call today Dear colleagues, with this note, we would like to help you to prepare for the meeting more efficiently. Bernie has kindly sent a document to the list with proposed responses and Mathieu has added an answer to question 25 a few hours ago, so you have all proposed answers in your inbox already. We had discussed the questions 1 to 27 during the last call. Except for questions 2 and 25, the answers are very straightforward. We will present and explain the answers during the call so you can safely focus on other areas of the document. Please take a look at questions 2 and 25. These are questions where we have tried to destill the essence of our discussion and prepare a response. You will hopefully agree that the proposed answers capture the views of the CCWG well. Then there is a third area of questions from number 28 onwards. We have proposed answers to 28 to 34 that should be uncontroversial so we hope to be able to finish the discussion on the list of questions from the legal teams quickly. Number 35 and onwards are topics from our group. You might wish to read that in preparation of the call. Thanks and tty soon. Thomas --
participants (3)
-
Kavouss Arasteh -
Sabine.Meyer＠bmwi.bund.de -
Thomas Rickert