Even when component parts of said community have expressed a wish to not be included in certain votes? I cannot see the logic in forcing people to do things against their will. -James On 01/10/2015 15:06, "accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch" <accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch> wrote:
The simple point is that decisions taken by the elected executive of the community should not be able to be overturned by anything less than a qualified majority of that community as a whole.
It's quite simple and it means that no such decisions should be allowed with less than the support from at least 4 SO/AC.
best
Jorge
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 01.10.2015 um 15:54 schrieb Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.NA>:
My view is that if someone chooses not to vote (s)he chooses not to vote. That is most certainly not capture.
el
In 2015-10-01 15:49, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
Dear All, Pls be so kind and think of a scenario that only two or three out of 7 SOs and ACs vote then the rest not voting will be captured by those two or three that voting .Even those two or three that voting may not have unanimous position . It is risky situation. Pls read my example and analyze the outcome. Regards Kavouss
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community