I support the participation of the Board's membrés as participants of CCWG .Why they should be excluded. ONCE AGAIN PARTICIPANTS ARE THOSE WHO ARE NOT FORMAL MEMBERS OF CCWG Regards Kavouss 2016-02-23 13:30 GMT+01:00 Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net>:
I do not speak to the merits of the Board's objection. There may be something of a point (or there may not).
But procedurally, it is very unfortunate.
The Board should consider whether it really wants to sink the ship over a ha'porth of tar.
On 23/02/16 12:25, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
So have your colleagues on the Board pull their objection.
el
On 2016-02-23 14:16, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" wrote:
My only recommendation to all parties is please, be flexible enough to find a fair compromise to enable moving forward. You have agreed 99 %. It would be a shame if in the last minute a remaining controversial issue blocks the historical agreement.
Wolfgang
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community