Dear Nigel, Tks for your views I have withdrawn the comments made as it was made unduly as results of wrong reading of the text. Sorry for that Regards 2016-05-26 10:16 GMT+02:00 Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net>:
Dear Kavouss
You have a 100% perfect right to find parts of the new By-Laws unacceptable, and I should defend to the death your right to say so; however you are, it seems to me, now tilting at windmills at this late stage. (I find the restriction of ICANN's committment to human rights to 'applicable law' (of which there is none) to be equally unacceptable.)
However, it is what it is.
The train has left the station. Elvis has left the building.
If you could suggest any procedural method about which 'unacceptable' parts of the proposed Draft Bylaws could be objected to and changed at this phase in their adoption, I would be delighted to hear it.
On the other hand, perhaps we should just take whatever gains we have made to dayte, and carry on the good work within WS2??
Nigel
On 26/05/16 08:37, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
This is a totally unacceptable proposal.
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community