hi Bruce, all Bruce: is the Board prepared to accept the existence of WS2 and to honor it? The public comments on the second draft report indicated no. If there has been an acceptance of the need to complete the project, that would be helpful to know. thanks Jordan On 3 November 2015 at 22:47, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
Hello Brett,
On the first point, is there a way to put in a time limit for Board consideration after the community settles on its recommendations?
I would expect about 14 days.
Also, what is the threshold for the Board to reject the WS2 recommendations?
Same as Work stream 1 – 2/3 vote to reject and then dialogue to resolve issues. See resolution from Los Angles in 2014.
Are the recommendations piecemeal or tied together?
Up to the CCWG.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- Jordan Carter Chief Executive *InternetNZ* +64-4-495-2118 (office) | +64-21-442-649 (mob) Email: jordan@internetnz.net.nz Skype: jordancarter Web: www.internetnz.nz *A better world through a better Internet *