Dear All, I am not comfortable with Steve proposal or his comrpomise. Perhaps we could work on some thing else. I have added another alternative : STATUS QUO and SUPPRESSION OF ST18 which in fact was invented by somebody and pushed through a working party and then CCWG Once again , 2/3 Majority for GAC Advice may encourage GAC to ACCEPT ST18. This is an important elemebnt Pls carefully consider that before GAC totally exclude that Kavouss 2016-01-30 3:13 GMT+01:00 Paul Rosenzweig < paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com>:
Mr. Brunner-Williams
I don't even understand your question. Perhaps you are too smart for me.
But to be clear I make no defense of the .Africa decision, nor a critique. I only note that the decision makes it clear that the GAC through its process did intervene.
-- Paul Rosenzweig Sent from myMail app for Android Friday, 29 January 2016, 08:58PM -05:00 from "Eric (Maule) Brunner-Williams" <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>:
Mr. Rosenzweig,
Is it your representation that something _must_ have occured prior to the GAC members severally and/or collectively arriving at a view on the merits of an application? If so, what please?
[Mr. Rosenzweig's spirited defense of the DCA Trust application for .africa omitted.]
Eric Brunner-Williams Eugene, Oregon