All: For what it's worth, I prepared track changes comparisons of the following: CCWG Proposal vs. AoC language Board Proposal vs. AoC language Board Proposal vs. CCWG Proposal These are attached. Greg On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net> wrote:
On 03/09/2015 13:27, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
Hello Malcolm,
On 02/09/2015 02:24, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
ICANN commits to enforcing its policy relating to the current WHOIS and any future gTLD Directory Service,
To be clear - we are not talking about any specific service here with any pre-conceived set of requirements.
Indeed. But I did think there was a risk that wording could be (mis)interpreted to suggest that we are - and then used to that effect when discussing what that future Directory Service might look like.
We are talking about a new service that is established as a result of a policy development process in the GNSO. If it helps you could add the text:
"any future gTLD DIrectory Service, established via ICANN's bottom up policy development process".
I think that would help.
The only point that I'm making is that we aren't trying to pre-empt that process or use this insertion into the Bylaws to direct certain outcomes from it. On that, I think we're all agreed; it's just a matter of being clear in the language we choose.
-- Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523 Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/
London Internet Exchange Ltd 21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY
Company Registered in England No. 3137929 Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community