To quote myself: On 2015-09-03 15:00 , Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Should we not perhaps await the outcome of the engagement first? [...]
But some say past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior. I am, myself, a firm believer that past behavior is a good predictor of future behavior. And some of us have been burned, while some of us have had to watch others being burned. Never mind that there is nothing in any or the transition related proposals that helps to prevent this from happening again, I doubt that we are achieving future-proofness. el On 2015-09-08 19:31 , James M. Bladel wrote:
Disagree, Nigel. It¹s not about the past, but rather an effort to future-proof the organization against individuals & groups we haven¹t event met yet.
Thanks‹
J.
On 9/8/15, 11:59 , "accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Nigel Roberts" <accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org on behalf of nigel@channelisles.net> wrote:
Roelof
You are a smart guy. You are open and ready to trust. These are admirable qualities.
But ICANN, as a collective entity, to those of us who were there at its beginnings needs to continually prove it is worthy of trust.
Because back then, it wasn't.
And some of us remember. [...]