Adding the endorsement of NetMundial principles to the Strat Plan is staff driven, not yet fully supported by the ICANN community. this should be referred to the CCWG-IG, not debated in either IANA or Accountability WGs. We should consider this aspirational on the part of ICANN staff. I appreciate your pointing this out, Rahul. Sent from my iPad
On Mar 29, 2015, at 10:20 PM, Rahul Sharma <wisdom.stoic@gmail.com> wrote:
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/strategic-plan-2016-2020-10oct14...
Page 22, Section 4.3 Participate in the evolution of a global, trusted, inclusive multistakeholder Internet governance ecosystem that addresses Internet issues.
One of the key success factors says:
Demonstrate leadership by implementing best practices in multistakeholder mechanisms within the distributed Internet governance ecosystem while encouraging all stakeholders to implement the principles endorsed at NETmundial.
Related questions:
Should a body like ICANN define and adopt Internet Principles it believes in, for its policy, strategy and operations?
Are group members aware whether endorsement of NETmundial principles is through a public consultation process involving community or an internal ICANN decision? Is this a matter that this group working on ICANN Accountability should discuss?
Kind Regards, Rahul Sharma _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community