Dear Mathieu, dear all, I looked at the updated memo comparing the different community empowerment models on the flight back from Buenos Aires and just wondered whether I missed (or simply misunderstood) something during our third BA working session comparing the empowered SO/AC membership resp. designator model. I had taken away from that working session the impression that the designator model might give us (in principle) all necessary community powers. But checking back with the chart in annex A of the attached legal memo I’m not quite so sure. In the very bottom of the chart the memo looks at the power to bind the board to implement IANA Function Review Recommendations (CWG dependency) and states that in a designator model only a reconsideration right would be viable but with limits on how often this could be done and not being ultimately binding. An approval and reconsideration right would only be viable in a membership model. Wouldn’t this CWG dependency influence our choice of model? Or this there another way to “solve” this dependency that I have simply missed? Best regards, Sabine Von: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Mathieu Weill Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2015 09:11 An: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Cc: Holly Gregory; Rosemary E. Fei; Hofheimer, Joshua T. Betreff: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: Re: [Acct-Legal] Memo - Revised Powers Chart, Voluntary Model Dear Colleagues, Attached is the updated memo from Sidley on the viability of the various powers in each model under study. The package of documents for the F2F meeting will be updated accordingly. Best Mathieu -------- Message transféré -------- Sujet : Re: [Acct-Legal] Memo - Revised Powers Chart, Voluntary Model Date : Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:12:09 +0000 De : Hofheimer, Joshua T. <jhofheimer@sidley.com><mailto:jhofheimer@sidley.com> Pour : 'ccwg-accountability5@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-accountability5@icann.org>' <ccwg-accountability5@icann.org><mailto:ccwg-accountability5@icann.org> Copie à : Sidley ICANN CCWG <sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com><mailto:sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com>, 'ICANN-Adler' <ICANN@adlercolvin.com><mailto:ICANN@adlercolvin.com> Dear Legal Sub-Team, Attached is revised draft of the memo submitted in the prior email describing the viability of the enumerated powers under the three models – Member model, Designator model and “Voluntary Collaboration†model (name of third model not settled). This memo responds to questions that came in from the CCWG upon reviewing the prior document. For your convenience, a clean and redline against the June 10 memo are attached. Thank you, Josh JOSHUA HOFHEIMER Partner Sidley Austin LLP +1.213.896.6061 jhofheimer@sidley.com<mailto:jhofheimer@sidley.com> From: Hofheimer, Joshua T. Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 9:10 PM To: ccwg-accountability5@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-accountability5@icann.org> Cc: Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler Subject: Memo - Revised Powers Chart, Voluntary Model Dear Legal Sub-Team, Further to the CCWG request on the call last Friday, attached is a memo revising the summary chart describing the viability of the enumerated powers under the three models – Member model, Designator Model and Voluntary Model. We also explore the impact of not having the SO/ACs organized legal persons to represent their interests. Cheers, Josh JOSHUA HOFHEIMER Sidley Austin LLP +1.213.896.6061 (LA direct) +1.650.565.7561 (PA direct) +1.323.708.2405 (cell) jhofheimer@sidley.com<mailto:jhofheimer@sidley.com> www.sidley.com<http://www.sidley.com/> [http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png]<http://www.sidley.com/> SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP From: ccwg-accountability5-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-accountability5-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ccwg-accountability5-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Hilton, Tyler Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 8:29 PM To: ccwg-accountability5@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-accountability5@icann.org> Subject: [Acct-Legal] Memo - Responses to CCWG GAC Questions Dear Legal Sub-team, Attached please find a memo responding to the list of questions from the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) provided to us on June 5, 2015. Best, TYLER HILTON Associate Sidley Austin LLP 555 West Fifth Street Los Angeles, CA 90013 +1.213.896.6130 thilton@sidley.com<mailto:thilton@sidley.com> www.sidley.com<http://www.sidley.com> [http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png]<http://www.sidley.com/> SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP **************************************************************************************************** This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately. ****************************************************************************************************