hi Alan Thanks for this and for the chat on the adobe room. I propose rewording this as follows: *Alternatively, a special committee of the NomCom could be established to deal with removal petitions when they arise. The composition of such a special committee has not been determined, and input is welcome.* Jordan On 30 April 2015 at 16:40, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
This section currently reads:
Alternatively, a special committee of the NomCom could be established to deal with removal petitions when they arise. Such a "Recall Committee" would have as chair a previous NomCom Chair and would otherwise be formulated on the same basis as the regular NomCom. Either option is legally viable.
As mentioned by both Cheryl and I, the implications of "and would otherwise be formulated on the same basis as the regular NomCom" are vast and likely not what this group really needs. I would strongly suggest that the phrase be omitted. We could either defer the details of this alternative until after the public comment (and perhaps ask for input), or defer it until WS2.
Also as noted, the sentence "Either option is legally viable." applies to both options 1 and 2 and should be the 2nd sentence of the base item g.
Alan
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- Jordan Carter Chief Executive *InternetNZ* 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob) jordan@internetnz.net.nz Skype: jordancarter *A better world through a better Internet *