Dear Steve, Thanks for the proposal. I would rephrase the following sentence "The CCWG is considering whether bylaws Article 18 Section 1 should be among the bylaws sections listed as “Fundamental Bylaws”, which would thereby require positive approval by Members/Designators." to the following, just to be clear we are considering two options: "The CCWG is considering whether bylaws Article 18 Section 1 should keep its current status or be among the bylaws sections listed as “Fundamental Bylaws”. In the latter case, any changes to it would require positive approval by Members/Designators. " Note: native speakers (and others) should feel free to optimize the language. Regards, Secretário Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva Divisão da Sociedade da Informação (DI) Ministério das Relações Exteriores - Brasil T: + 55 61 2030-6609 Secretary Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva Division of Information Society (DI) Ministry of External Relations - Brazil T: + 55 61 2030-6609 -----Mensagem original----- De: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] Em nome de Steve DelBianco Enviada em: sexta-feira, 24 de abril de 2015 12:38 Para: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Assunto: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: draft proposal for AoC section 8 - for our next call Per Mathieu's request, here is a one page summary of proposed way to deal with AoC section 8. I tried to reflect suggestions from our last call. Look forward to discussion. — Steve DelBianco Executive Director NetChoice http://www.NetChoice.org <http://www.netchoice.org/> and http://blog.netchoice.org <http://blog.netchoice.org/> +1.703.615.6206