I agree with Avri. Further, Board B seems to become some kind of mutant hybrid of Board and management, which should be different roles. While we can always explore it fully (within some sense of time constraints), I would not see much mileage in doing so. Greg On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
Hi,
I have never understood the appeal of such a model. To me it seems like twice as much Board to worry about in an environment of never really knowing where the ultimate responsibility lay.
avri
On 19-Feb-15 13:00, Mr R.T. Daniel wrote:
Thinking out loud. So is there any mileage in having an icann A & icann B. "A" board = public interest & contract co. "B" board private non profit implementing Board A 's ..policy frameworks....etc...etc.. Board B answerable to board A? RD
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community