On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 01:26:36PM +0100, Malcolm Hutty wrote:
What if the reason for rejecting the budget/plan is that ICANN failed to hold a public comment period?
That seems like it'd be a pretty good rationale to me. No?
Yes it is but there would have been no opportunity to submit it to public comment. I guess that was the point Malcom was trying to make (unless i missed his point)
Cheers!
A
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng <seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng>* Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!