I know that the Annex 11 is on for discussion today. Is it just me or does it seem to others near impossible to reach a conclusion on Annex 11 without the GAC’s input? Even if, in the end, we wind up not accepting their position I would have thought it essential to do so knowing what that position is. Or is it the case that we are going to drive ahead and just proceed without the GAC because they can’t meet our timeline of consideration? Paul Paul Rosenzweig <mailto:paul.rosenzweigesq@redbranchconsulting.com> paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com O: +1 (202) 547-0660 M: +1 (202) 329-9650 VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739 Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066 <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article...> Link to my PGP Key <http://www.rsaconference.com/events/us16?utm_source=signature&utm_medium=ema...> From: León Felipe Sánchez Ambía [mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx] Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 8:15 PM To: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org> Cc: ACCT-Staff <acct-staff@icann.org> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: GAC views on draft recommendations of the third draft proposal of the CCWG-accountability Dear all, I am forwarding the GAC’s views on the draft recommendations of our third draft proposal. Best regards, León Inicio del mensaje reenviado: De: <Thomas.Schneider@bakom.admin.ch <mailto:Thomas.Schneider@bakom.admin.ch> > Asunto: GAC views on draft recommendations of the third draft proposal of the CCWG-accountability Fecha: 25 de enero de 2016, 6:50:14 p.m. GMT-6 Para: <thomas@rickert.net <mailto:thomas@rickert.net> >, <mathieu.weill@afnic.fr <mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr> >, <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx <mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx> > Cc: <gac@icann.org <mailto:gac@icann.org> > Dear Co-Chairs Please find attached the GAC’s views on the draft recommendations of the third draft proposal of the CCWG Accountability. Best regards Thomas Thomas Schneider Chair ICANN Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC)
