Dear Rosemary, Dear Leon Dear All, Before certifying question to be studied , one need to verify the practicality and workability of the study. Issue 1 How many PICs have been received? Perhaps some 500 Issue 2 How many were expected to have been received? Perhaps About 1930, equal to the No. of strings gTLDs Issue 3 How many supplementary PICs Were submitted by applicants? No Real statistics Issue 4 Are there any typical or some typical PIC or PICs available? Issue 5 What the meaning of term "typical PIC "in legal language? Issue 6 Does a typical PIC, if any, could cover the objectives of PIC in general legal terms? I think we are hijacked by a question raised which would be Impractical to study and impractical to infer ant thing from that. Now, should we not DROP the Question? Regards Kavouss Sent from my iPhone
On 12 Dec 2015, at 00:50, Rosemary E. Fei <rfei@adlercolvin.com> wrote:
How large is the universe of existing PICs? Perhaps someone on the CCWG could provide us with a representative sampling of existing PICs, and we can then review them and draw our own conclusions about what’s a “typical” provision?
Rosemary
Rosemary E. Fei Adler & Colvin 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1220 San Francisco, CA 94104 415/421-7555 (phone) 415/421-0712 (fax) rfei@adlercolvin.com www.adlercolvin.com
_____________________________ Adler & Colvin is a San Francisco Green Business certified by the City and County of San Francisco. Please consider the environment before you print this email.
From: Malcolm Hutty [mailto:malcolm@linx.net] Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 3:34 PM To: Holly Gregory Cc: León Felipe Sánchez Ambía; Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler; ACCT-Staff (acct-staff@icann.org); Thomas Rickert; Accountability Cross Community Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Resolution of Mission Language related to regulation and contract
On 11 Dec 2015, at 22:15, Gregory, Holly <holly.gregory@sidley.com> wrote:
We will need information on the kind of provisions that PICs have typically included. Could ICANN legal provide that information to us?
And therein lies the rub.
I think CCWG members are likely to have differing views as to what should be considered "typical" and what aberrant. Nor would I consider ICANN legal a neutral advisor to you on this, if it were making any kind of qualitative judgement. _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community