Dear Fellow Members, Having worked on IP for decades and having lead at least 2 teams pleading cases at the OAS Interamerican Human Rights Court I thought I would be able to contribute to the discussion. However, I see an agenda that is quite advanced. Would any of you tell me what is the goal if INTA in this field and what has been done so far? That way I could determine if I can make a contribution or If I am late and would only be a hindrance to the team. Thank you kindly Norman Caldera 2017-01-18 16:47 GMT-06:00 matthew shears <mshears@cdt.org>:
I am not sure what is meant by the the first sentence. However, 60 days is, and should be, more than a sufficient period of time for the public consultation, particularly given that the standard public comment period is, I understand from the co-chairs e-mail, 42 days.
Matthew
On 18/01/2017 21:03, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
Dear David, yes some sector do not realize that others including some if not all 8 those who are your allies do not have problem ).GAC members would have problem. The shorter the time ,the better for some people but not for some , the majority of GAC Members. I strongly oppose to the 19 March deadline for the reasons already given Regards Kavouss
2017-01-18 21:05 GMT+01:00 McAuley, David <dmcauley@verisign.com>:
Thanks Mathieu,
I see no issue with the schedule as proposed.
Best regards,
David
David McAuley
International Policy Manager
Verisign Inc.
703-948-4154 <%28703%29%20948-4154>
*From:* accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Mathieu Weill *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2017 5:50 AM *To:* 'Accountability Cross Community' *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [CCWG-ACCT] Timeline for HR and Jurisdiction publications
Dear Colleagues,
Although it is uncertain exactly when the questionnaire for Jurisdiction and the public comment for Human Rights will actually be published the Co-Chairs would suggest that the closing date for both of these be after the Copenhagen meeting.
The reasoning behind this is that at best the standard 42 days consultation period would end immediately prior to the Copenhagen - this would imply chartering organizations and community members would be considering this while they are preparing for Copenhagen - which as Cheryl Langdon-Orr has pointed out on our last plenary is not an ideal situation. Additionally staff would not have enough time to prepare the report on these for our consideration in Copenhagen.
Additionally the jurisdiction questionnaire is meant to be considered by a wider community and as such it would be good to extend the standard period to 60 days to allow everyone ample opportunity to answer the questionnaire.
As such we would recommend that the closing period for the Human Rights public consultation be Sunday 19 March 23:59 UTC and that the Jurisdiction questionnaire request responses within 60 days of the initial publication.
Thank you in advance for your feedbacks on this proposal.
Best regards,
Thomas, Leon & Mathieu
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing listAccountability-Cross-Community@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- ------------ Matthew Shears Global Internet Policy and Human Rights Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)+ 44 771 2472987 <+44%207712%20472987>
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
--