Hello Seun,
Yeah Izumi, that's fine, when I said NRO NC/ASO in my mind I meant NRO NC/ASO AC.
Understood.
My main concern was about who should be formerly commenting to ICANN PC in this process "representatively". The fact that the current PC is bylaw related and not policy related hence has to be done by the EC clarified my concern.
OK, that's great to know. I know this is pretty confusing for many people so thank you for raising this question. Izumi On 2016/05/18 13:26, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
Yeah Izumi, that's fine, when I said NRO NC/ASO in my mind I meant NRO NC/ASO AC.
My main concern was about who should be formerly commenting to ICANN PC in this process "representatively". The fact that the current PC is bylaw related and not policy related hence has to be done by the EC clarified my concern.
Regards
Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos On 18 May 2016 02:12, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi@nic.ad.jp> wrote:
Seun, it is actually a good question.
I understand you already have an office-list clarification and glad to you know it's clear to you now. Let me still respond on the list as there may be others who have a similar question.
is there a reason why the NRO-EC is doing the work of(or rather
performing the role) the NRO-NC/ASO?
It is incorrect to assume NRO NC is an equivalent of the ASO. ASO is a form of representation in ICANN from the Number Resource Organisation (NRO). It is based on the ASO MoU agreed between RIRs and ICANN. In NRO, there are "NRO Number Council (NRO NC)" and "NRO Executive Council (NRO EC)". The NRO is led by an Executive Council (NRO EC).
- The role of the ASO AC(NRO NC) is focused on recommendations on IP address policy. - Since the ICANN accountability work is outside the scope of the ASO AC(NRO NC), it is being handled by the ASO as a whole. - ASO is equivalent to the NRO, which is represented by the NRO EC.
This is why the NRO EC has been leading the ASO position for the CCWG proposal, and has submitted comment to the draft new ICANN Bylaws. The NRO EC has shared the public comments on the new ICANN Bylaws, and called for feedback from the Internet numbers community on the dedicated mailing list.
NRO NC: - An elected body called, which serves as the ASO Address Council (ASO AC). In short, NRO NC is an equivalent of ASO AC. - It oversees recommendations on IP address policy, including the management of policy development activities. NRO EC: - Represents the NRO and its suborganizations in all matters, and agree on the composition and responsibilities of the NRO Number Council.
For more details, please see the documents below. * ASO MOU, in which ICANN and the RIRs agree that the NRO shall fulfill the role, responsibilities and functions of the ASO, and agree on the composition and responsibilities of the ASO Address Council. < https://archive.icann.org/en/aso/aso-mou-29oct04.htm>
* NRO MOU, in which the RIRs agree that the NRO Executive Council represents the NRO and its suborganizations in all matters, and agree on the composition and responsibilities of the NRO Number Council. < https://www.nro.net/documents/nro-memorandum-of-understanding>
I hope this helps!
Izumi
On 2016/05/17 20:20, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
Got off-list clarification. Thanks!
Cheers!
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote:
Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos On 17 May 2016 04:22, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi@nic.ad.jp> wrote:
Best Regards,
Oscar Robles Chair of NRO Executive Committee for the ASO
SO: Pardon my manners and perhaps too much attention on minor procedural
issue; is there a reason why the NRO-EC is doing the work of(or rather performing the role) the NRO-NC/ASO?
Regards ---
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community