Dear All, I have made some analysis of Annex D to the draft Bylaws and found a serious misunderstanding on. how EC powers should be translated / converted into legal terms/provision for inclusion in the Bylaws My comments are attached Regards Kavouss ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> Date: 2016-04-08 8:32 GMT+02:00 Subject: Re: [bylaws-coord] Corrected Bylaws document - 2 April 2016 version, as corrected on 7 April 2016 To: Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner@icann.org>, Holly Gregory < holly.gregory@sidley.com>, "Rosemary E. Fei" <rfei@adlercolvin.com>, Mathieu Weill <Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr>, Thomas Rickert <thomas@rickert.net>, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>, "< Thomas.Schneider@bakom.admin.ch>" <Thomas.Schneider@bakom.admin.ch>, Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@gmail.com>, Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva < pedro.ivo@itamaraty.gov.br>, "<Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch>" < Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch>, "<Sabine.Meyer@bmwi.bund.de>" < Sabine.Meyer@bmwi.bund.de>, "<gac-leadership@icann.org>" < gac-leadership@icann.org> Cc: "bylaws-coord@icann.org" <bylaws-coord@icann.org>, ICANN-Adler < ICANN@adlercolvin.com>, Sidley ICANN CCWG <sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com> Dear Samantha Pls kindly convey my message sent last night on how reflect the Carve- Out in the Bylaws in exact quotation of the texts as contained in Recs. 1&2 by creating to distinct and specific provision in that regard without going through a very heavy drafting which may intentionally it unintentionally expand the very limited occurrence of that circumstances. I have serious concerns and strong objections to the existing draft in that relations Tks Kavouss Sent from my iPhone On 7 Apr 2016, at 23:02, Samantha Eisner via bylaws-coord < bylaws-coord@icann.org> wrote: Dear Bylaws Coordination Group - In our reviews of the document since circulation on Sunday, the attorneys have identified a set of items that were unintentionally omitted from the document as it was being prepared for distribution, as well as a few typos and minor corrections that needed to be addressed based upon the language agreed over the weekend. These updates do not address the items that have been under discussion in this group, the CWG or the CCWG. We are all continuing to follow those discussions so that changes can be incorporated into a new version. The clean up items that are reflected in the attached track changes version are: a) 4.2(f) - inserted omitted provision b) 4.3(v) - typo c) 4.3(w) - typo d) 4.3(d) - busted section reference (no longer a provision for Community IRP in Bylaws; assuming it should just be reference to Community IRP in Annex D) e) 4.3(e) - busted section reference (no longer a provision for Community IRP in Bylaws; assuming it should just be reference to Community IRP in Annex D) f) 6.1(c) - typo g) 7.24 - inserted omitted provision h) 7.25 - inserted omitted provision i) 8.1 - typo j) 9.2(b) - typo 11.3(f) - typo k) 16.3 - inserted omitted provision l) 18.1 - updated section reference m) 18.9(a) words missing at the end "shall be the action of the IFRT." n) 19.1(c)(i) first sentence should be "An SCWG Creation Approval shall become effective..." o) 19.1(c)(ii) first sentence should be "An SCWG Creation Approval that has been rejected..." p) 19.7(a) words missing at the end "shall be the action of the SCWG." q) 25.2 – Fixed heading r) 27.2(c)(iii) - inserted omitted provision s) Annex D, Section 1.4(b)(ii) – fixed threshold reference from “two or more” to “*three* or more” t) Annex E, Section 1(e) - typo Thanks, Sam Eisner <DRAFT-NEW-ICANN-BYLAWS-vers2APR-UPDATED 7 April.docx> _______________________________________________ bylaws-coord mailing list bylaws-coord@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/bylaws-coord