Mike, Good point and good catch. This should not have been overlooked. Greg On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Chartier, Mike S <mike.s.chartier@intel.com
wrote:
I think this is another illustration of how we need to be careful in documenting the process for handling comments (other than the Boards). For Recommendation 11 several commenters offered the proposal to add a requirement for GAC advice to be accompanied by a rationale. Given the general acceptance of proposals for rationales in other areas, I would have thought it would have at least been given a note in the prep document.
Look forward to discussing on Tues.
*From:* accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Alice Jansen *Sent:* Friday, January 15, 2016 12:01 PM *To:* accountability-cross-community@icann.org *Subject:* [CCWG-ACCT] DOCUMENT - Rec 11 - GAC Advice (first reading)
*Sent on behalf of CCWG-ACCT Co-Chairs*
In preparation for your R*ecommendation 11 – GAC Advice (first reading)* discussion scheduled for your call #78 - Tuesday, 19 January 2016 (12:00 – 15:00 UTC) - please find attached the material to review.
Please use this email thread to circulate any comments you may have in advance of the call.
Thank you
Mathieu, Thomas, León
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community