Nigel, you don't have to address this, nobody of note takes his waffling serious, and not only since he's lame duck. It's just a shame that he's cost ICANN almost as much in salaries, travel and whatever else as they have spent on the transition so far. At least the blonde pot head was cheaper. el -- Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
On 21 Dec 2015, at 08:14, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote:
You mean this part: ICANN is looking forward to work with all stakeholders, including the I* organizations, in the future deliberations and discussions, as defined in the WSIS+10 Outcome Document.
Or the one below:
We at ICANN look forward to increased dialogue, understanding and cooperation with the people from the UN, its agencies and the missions, to make sure the Internet continues to develop with full participation of all stakeholders.
Otherwise could you clarify the position referred.
Regards
On Dec 21, 2015 6:58 AM, "Nigel Roberts" <nigel@channelisles.net> wrote: Can I please ask the Board Members here if the position taken by the Corporation in this initiative was approved by the Board beforehand?
If it was, is this not contradictory to the principle of multistakeholderim.
If it was not, why is the Board not keeping a closer watch on the positions staff are committing you to?
On 21/12/15 05:05, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote: No, please don't, it's just his usual waffling without content.
el
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community